clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2000
Volume 797, Page 129   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
Ch. 11
PARRIS N. GLENDENING, Governor
(A) OCCURS AFTER THE TENDERING PARTY IS SEASONABLY
NOTIFIED OF REFUSAL; (B) IS NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION AND IS SOLELY PART OF MEASURES
REASONABLE UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES TO AVOID OR REDUCE LOSS; AND (C) IS NOT CONTRARY TO INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING
DISPOSITION OF THE COPY RECEIVED FROM THE PARTY IN BREACH. (2) A PARTY THAT REFUSES A COPY SHALL: (A) DELIVER THE COPY AND ALL COPIES MADE OF IT, ALL ACCESS
MATERIALS, AND DOCUMENTATION PERTAINING TO THE REFUSED INFORMATION TO
THE TENDERING PARTY OR HOLD THEM WITH REASONABLE CARE FOR A
REASONABLE TIME FOR DISPOSAL AT THAT PARTY'S INSTRUCTIONS; AND (B) FOLLOW REASONABLE INSTRUCTIONS OF THE TENDERING
PARTY FOR RETURNING OR DELIVERING COPIES, ACCESS MATERIAL, AND
DOCUMENTATION, BUT INSTRUCTIONS ARE NOT REASONABLE IF THE TENDERING
PARTY DOES NOT ARRANGE FOR PAYMENT OF OR REIMBURSEMENT FOR
REASONABLE EXPENSES OF COMPLYING WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS. (3) IF THE TENDERING PARTY DOES NOT GIVE INSTRUCTIONS WITHIN A
REASONABLE TIME AFTER BEING NOTIFIED OF REFUSAL, THE REFUSING PARTY, IN A
REASONABLE MANNER TO REDUCE OR AVOID LOSS, MAY STORE THE COPIES, ACCESS
MATERIAL, AND DOCUMENTATION FOR THE TENDERING PARTY'S ACCOUNT OR SHIP
THEM TO THE TENDERING PARTY AND IS ENTITLED TO REIMBURSEMENT FOR
REASONABLE COSTS OF STORAGE AND SHIPMENT. (4) BOTH PARTIES REMAIN BOUND BY ALL CONTRACTUAL USE TERMS
THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN ENFORCEABLE HAD THE PERFORMANCE NOT BEEN
REFUSED. (5) IN COMPLYING WITH THIS SECTION, THE REFUSING PARTY SHALL
ACT IN GOOD FAITH. CONDUCT IN GOOD FAITH UNDER THIS SECTION IS NOT
ACCEPTANCE OR CONVERSION AND MAY NOT BE A GROUND FOR AN ACTION FOR
DAMAGES UNDER THE CONTRACT. 21-707. COPY: REVOCATION OF ACCEPTANCE. (A) A PARTY THAT ACCEPTS A NONCONFORMING TENDER OF A COPY MAY
REVOKE ACCEPTANCE ONLY IF THE NONCONFORMITY IS A MATERIAL BREACH OF
CONTRACT AND THE PARTY ACCEPTED IT: (1) ON THE REASONABLE ASSUMPTION THAT THE NONCONFORMITY
WOULD BE CURED, AND THE NONCONFORMITY WAS NOT SEASONABLY CURED; (2) DURING A CONTINUING EFFORT BY THE PARTY IN BREACH AT
ADJUSTMENT AND CURE, AND THE BREACH WAS NOT SEASONABLY CURED; OR (3) WITHOUT DISCOVERY OF THE NONCONFORMITY, IF ACCEPTANCE
WAS REASONABLY INDUCED EITHER BY THE OTHER PARTY'S ASSURANCES OR BY
THE DIFFICULTY OF DISCOVERY BEFORE ACCEPTANCE.
- 129 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2000
Volume 797, Page 129   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact msa.helpdesk@maryland.gov.

©Copyright  August 17, 2024
Maryland State Archives