clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1997
Volume 795, Page 3361   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

PARRIS N. GLENDENING, Governor

Ch. 609

(c)     If a child support order of this State is modified by a tribunal of another state
pursuant to THIS SUBTITLE OR a law substantially similar to this subtitle, a tribunal of
this State loses its continuing, exclusive jurisdiction with regard to' prospective
enforcement of the order issued in this State, and may only:

(1)     enforce the order that was modified as to amounts accruing before the
modification;

(2)     enforce nonmodifiable aspects of that order; and

(3)     provide other appropriate relief for violations of that order which
occurred before the effective date of the modification.

(d)     A tribunal of this State shall recognize the continuing, exclusive jurisdiction of
a tribunal of another state which has issued a child support order pursuant to THIS
SUBTITLE OR a law substantially similar to this subtitle.

(e)     A temporary support order issued ex parte or pending resolution of a
jurisdictional conflict does not create continuing, exclusive jurisdiction in the issuing
tribunal.

(f)     A tribunal of this State issuing a support order consistent with the law of this
State has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over a spousal support order throughout the
existence of the support obligation. A tribunal of this State may not modify a spousal
support order issued by a tribunal of another state having continuing, exclusive
jurisdiction over that order under the law of that state.

[10-307.] 10-309.

(a)     A tribunal of this State may serve as an initiating tribunal to request a tribunal
of another state to enforce or modify a support order issued in that state.

(b)     A tribunal of this State having continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over a support
order may act as a responding tribunal to enforce or modify the order. If a party subject
to the continuing, exclusive jurisdiction of the tribunal no longer resides in the issuing
state, in subsequent proceedings the tribunal may apply [§ 10-325] § 10-328 OF THIS
SUBTITLE (SPECIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE) TO RECEIVE EVIDENCE
FROM ANOTHER STATE AND § 10-330 of this subtitle (Assistance with discovery) to
obtain discovery through a tribunal of another state.

(c)     A tribunal of this State which lacks continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over a
spousal support order may not serve as a responding tribunal to modify a spousal support
order of another state.

Subpart [B.] C. Reconciliation [With] OF MULTIPLE Orders [of Other States].
[10-308.] 10-310.

(a) If a proceeding is brought under this subtitle[,] and [one or more child
support orders have been issued in this or another state with regard to an obligor and a
child, a tribunal of this State shall apply the following rules in determining which order to
recognize for purposes of continuing, exclusive jurisdiction:

- 3361 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1997
Volume 795, Page 3361   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives