clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1997
Volume 795, Page 1823   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

PARRIS N. GLENDENING, Governor

Ch. 175

CHAPTER 175
(Senate Bill 430)

AN ACT concerning

Vehicle Laws - Use of Headlamps

FOR the purpose of requiring the driver of a vehicle to light the vehicle's headlamps,
parking lights, or fog lights when the vehicle's windshield wipers are being operated
under certain conditions; specifying that a violation of this Act is not a moving
violation for certain purposes; providing that if a person is convicted of violating this
Act the conviction may not be considered evidence of negligence or contributory
negligence, limit liability of a party or insurer, or diminish recovery for damages
arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or operation of a motor vehicle;
establishing a certain penalty; permitting the enforcement of this Act only as a
secondary violation; and generally relating to a requirement that headlamps,
parking lights, or fog lights be lighted at certain times.

BY adding to

Article - Transportation

Section 22-201.2

Annotated Code of Maryland

(1992 Replacement Volume and 1996 Supplement)

SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF
MARYLAND, That the Laws of Maryland read as follows:

Article - Transportation

22-201.2.

(A) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS SUBTITLE, IF A
DRIVER OF A VEHICLE ON A HIGHWAY OPERATES THE VEHICLE'S WINDSHIELD
WIPERS FOR A CONTINUOUS PERIOD OF TIME BECAUSE OF IMPAIRED VISIBILITY
RESULTING FROM UNFAVORABLE ATMOSPHERIC CONDITIONS, THE DRIVER SHALL
LIGHT THE VEHICLE'S HEADLAMPS, PARKING LIGHTS, OR FOG LIGHTS.

(B) A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS NOT CONSIDERED A MOVING
VIOLATION FOR PURPOSES OF § 16-402 OF THIS ARTICLE.

(C) (1) IF A PERSON IS CONVICTED UNDER THIS SECTION, THE CONVICTION
MAY NOT:

(I) BE CONSIDERED EVIDENCE OF NEGLIGENCE;

(II) BE CONSIDERED EVIDENCE OF CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE;

(III) LIMIT LIABILITY OF A PARTY OR AN INSURER; OR

(IV) DIMINISH RECOVERY FOR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE
OWNERSHIP, MAINTENANCE, OR OPERATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE.

- 1823 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1997
Volume 795, Page 1823   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives