clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1996
Volume 794, Page 4383   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

PARRIS N. GLENDENING, Governor

H.B. 1214

AS A CONDITION TO THE GRANT RENEWAL OR CONTINUATION OF A FRANCHISE
AGREEMENT, TO: UNDERUTILIZE FACILITIES OWNED BY THE DEALER IF THE
UNDERUTILIZATION WOULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
BUSINE
SS OF THE DEALER

(1) ELIMINATE FROM THE USE OF THE DEALER'S FACILITIES A
DEALERSHIP FOR WHICH THE DEALER HAS A FRANCHISE AGREEMENT TO UTILIZE
THE FACILITIES AS OF MARCH 1, 1996; OR

(2) MATERIALLY CHANGE THE DEALER'S FACILITIES OR METHOD OF
CONDUCTING BUSINESS IF THE CHANGE WOULD IMPOSE SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL
HARDSHIP ON THE BUSINESS OF THE DEALER.

(E)     (1) A MANUFACTURER, DISTRIBUTOR, OR FACTORY BRANCH,
WHETHER DIRECTLY OR THROUGH AN AGENT, EMPLOYEE OR REPRESENTATIVE,
MAY NOT REQUIRE OR COERCE A DEALER TO ADHERE TO PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS THAT ARE NOT APPLIED UNIFORMLY TO OTHER DEALERS
FRANCHISED IN THE STATE BY THAT MANUFACTURER, DISTRIBUTOR, OR FACTORY
BRANCH
SIMILARLY SITUATED DEALERS.

(2) A PERFORMANCE STANDARD OR PROGRAM FOR MEASURING
DEALERSHIP PERFORMANCE THAT MAY HAVE A MATERIAL EFFECT ON A DEALER
AND THE APPLICATION OF THE STANDARD OR PROGRAM BY A MANUFACTURER,
DISTRIBUTOR, OR FACTORY BRANCH SHALL BE FAIR, REASONABLE. EQUITABLE,
AND BASED ON ACCURATE INFORMATION.

(3) (I) IF THE PERFORMANCE STANDARD IS BASED ON A SURVEY, IT
MUST BE SHOWN THAT:

1.       THE SURVEY WAS DESIGNED WITH EXPERTS:

2.        THE PROPER UNIVERSE WAS EXAMINED:

3.        A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE WAS CHOSEN: AND

4.        THE DATA WAS ACCURATELY REPORTED.

(II) THE MANUFACTURER, DISTRIBUTOR, OR FACTORY BRANCH
SHALL ESTABLISH THE OBJECTIVITY OF THE SURVEY PROCESS AND PROVIDE THIS
INFORMATION TO ANY DEALER OF THE SAME LINE MAKE COVERED BY THE
SURVEY ON REQUEST.

(F)     A FRANCHISE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT OFFERED TO A
DEALER BY A MANUFACTURER, DISTRIBUTOR, OR FACTORY BRANCH MAY NOT
CONTAIN ANY PROVISION REQUIRING:

(1) ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES AT THE SOLE OPTION OF A PARTY;

(2) REFERRAL OF DISPUTES TO A DEALER BOARD OR COURT IN
ANOTHER JURISDICTION;

(3) PAYMENT BY THE DEALER OF LEGAL EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE
MANUFACTURER, DISTRIBUTOR, OR FACTORY BRANCH
; OR

- 4383 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1996
Volume 794, Page 4383   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives