clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1996
Volume 794, Page 3784   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

Ch. 667                                    1996 LAWS OF MARYLAND

(C)     IF A CHILD SUPPORT ORDER OF THIS STATE IS MODIFIED BY A TRIBUNAL
OF ANOTHER STATE PURSUANT TO A LAW SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO THIS
SUBTITLE, A TRIBUNAL OF THIS STATE LOSES ITS CONTINUING, EXCLUSIVE
JURISDICTION WITH REGARD TO PROSPECTIVE ENFORCEMENT OF THE ORDER
ISSUED IN THIS STATE, AND MAY ONLY:

(1)     ENFORCE THE ORDER THAT WAS MODIFIED AS TO AMOUNTS
ACCRUING BEFORE THE MODIFICATION;

(2)     ENFORCE NONMODIFIABLE ASPECTS OF THAT ORDER; AND

(3)     PROVIDE OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF THAT
ORDER WHICH OCCURRED BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE MODIFICATION.

(D)    A TRIBUNAL OF THIS STATE SHALL RECOGNIZE THE CONTINUING,
EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF A TRIBUNAL OF ANOTHER STATE WHICH HAS ISSUED
A CHILD SUPPORT ORDER PURSUANT TO A LAW SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO THIS
SUBTITLE.

(E)     A TEMPORARY SUPPORT ORDER ISSUED EX PARTE OR PENDING
RESOLUTION OF A JURISDICTIONAL CONFLICT DOES NOT CREATE CONTINUING,
EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION IN THE ISSUING TRIBUNAL.

(F)     A TRIBUNAL OF THIS STATE ISSUING A SUPPORT ORDER CONSISTENT
WITH THE LAW OF THIS STATE HAS CONTINUING, EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OVER A
SPOUSAL SUPPORT ORDER THROUGHOUT THE EXISTENCE OF THE SUPPORT
OBLIGATION. A TRIBUNAL OF THIS STATE MAY NOT MODIFY A SPOUSAL SUPPORT
ORDER ISSUED BY A TRIBUNAL OF ANOTHER STATE HAVING CONTINUING,
EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OVER THAT ORDER UNDER THE LAW OF THAT STATE

10-307. ENFORCEMENT AND MODIFICATION OF SUPPORT ORDER BY TRIBUNAL
HAVING CONTINUING JURISDICTION.

(A)    A TRIBUNAL OF THIS STATE MAY SERVE AS AN INITIATING TRIBUNAL TO
REQUEST A TRIBUNAL OF ANOTHER STATE TO ENFORCE OR MODIFY A SUPPORT
ORDER ISSUED IN THAT STATE

(B)     A TRIBUNAL OF THIS STATE HAVING CONTINUING, EXCLUSIVE
JURISDICTION OVER A SUPPORT ORDER MAY ACT AS A RESPONDING TRIBUNAL TO
ENFORCE OR MODIFY THE ORDER. IF A PARTY SUBJECT TO THE CONTINUING,
EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE TRIBUNAL NO LONGER RESIDES IN THE ISSUING
STATE, IN SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS THE TRIBUNAL MAY APPLY § 10-325 OF THIS
SUBTITLE (ASSISTANCE WITH DISCOVERY) TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY THROUGH A
TRIBUNAL OF ANOTHER STATE.

(C) A TRIBUNAL OF THIS STATE WHICH LACKS CONTINUING, EXCLUSIVE
JURISDICTION OVER A SPOUSAL SUPPORT ORDER MAY NOT SERVE AS A
RESPONDING TRIBUNAL TO MODIFY A SPOUSAL SUPPORT ORDER OF ANOTHER
STATE.

- 3784 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1996
Volume 794, Page 3784   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives