clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1996
Volume 794, Page 3220   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

Ch. 563                                    1996 LAWS OF MARYLAND

(II) THE DISTRIBUTION AND MEDIAN AVERAGE OF CURRENT
SENTENCES SERVED FOR EACH CRIMINAL OFFENSE;

(III) TRENDS IN THE GROWTH OF THE CORRECTIONAL
POPULATION, INCARCERATION RATES, AND CORRECTIONAL COSTS;

(IV) TRENDS IN THE DEMOGRAPHIC AND OFFENSE PROFILE OF
INCARCERATED OFFENDERS, INCLUDING TRENDS IN INMATES' MOST SERIOUS
CURRENT CONVICTION OFFENSE;

(V) THE PREVALENCE OF INTERMEDIATE PUNISHMENTS IN
JURI
SDICTIONS THROUGHOUT THE STATE, AND THE NUMBER OF OFFENDERS
ASSIGNED TO SUCH SANCTIONS; AND

(VI) TRENDS IN REPORTED CRIME AND CRIME RATES, ARRESTS
AND ARREST RATES, CONVICTION
S AND CONVICTION RATES, AND VICTIMIZATION
RATES.

(2) (3) (I) THE COMMISSION SHALL DEVELOP A CORRECTIONAL
POPULATION SIMULATION MODEL TO PREDICT ASSIST IN DETERMINING THE STATE
AND LOCAL CORRECTIONAL RESOURCES THAT:

1. ARE REQUIRED UNDER CURRENT SENTENCING
PRACTICES AND THOSE LAWS, POLICIES, AND PRACTICES RELATING TO
SENTENCING, PAROLE AND MANDATORY SUPERVISION; AND

2. WOULD BE REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT THE
COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATIONS.

(II) IF THE COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATIONS WOULD RESULT IN
STATE AND LOCAL INMATE POPULATIONS THAT WOULD EXCEED THE OPERATING
CAPACITIES OF AVAILABLE FACILITIES, THEN THE COMMISSION SHALL PRESENT
ADDITIONAL SENTENCING MODEL ALTERNATIVES CONSISTENT WITH THESE
CAPACITIES.

(II) THE COMMISSION SHALL APPLY THE MODEL TO A GIVEN FACT
SITUATION OR THEORETICAL CHANGE IN THE
SENTENCING LAWS OR POLICIES
WHEN REQUESTED TO DO SO BY THE CHAIRPERSON OR THE COMMISSION AS A
WHOLE.

(III) THE CHAIRPERSON SHALL MAKE THE MODEL AVAILABLE TO
RESPOND TO ANY INQUIRY FROM A STATE LEGISLATOR OR FROM THE SECRETARY
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES.

(3) THE COMMISSION SHALL DEVELOP AND RECOMMEND A
STRUCTURED SENTENCING MODEL CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICY GOALS AND
OBJECTIVES PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (F) OF THIS SECTION FOR USE BY
SENTENCING COURTS AND CORRECTIONAL AGENCIES IN DETERMINING THE MOST
APPROPRIATE SENTENCE TO BE IMPOSED ON A CRIMINAL OFFENDER. IN
DEVELOPING THE STRUCTURED
SENTENCING MODEL, THE COMMISSION SHALL:

- 3220 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1996
Volume 794, Page 3220   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives