clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1995
Volume 793, Page 3337   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

PARRIS N. GLENDENING, Governor

Ch. 582

Section 3-2A-01 through 3-2A-09, inclusive

Annotated Code of Maryland

(1989 Replacement Volume and 1994 Supplement)

BY adding to

Article - Courts and Judicial Proceedings
Section 3-2A-01 3-2A-06A(f) and 3-2A-06B
Annotated Code of Maryland
(1989 Replacement Volume and 1994 Supplement)

SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF
MARYLAND, That Section(s) 3-2A-01 through 3-2A-09, inclusive, of Articl
e—Courts
and Judicial Proceedings of the Annotated Code of Maryland be
repealed.

SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, That the Laws of Maryland read as follows:

Article - Courts and Judicial Proceedings

3-2A-01.

(A) (1) (I) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION,
UNLESS THE SOLE ISSUE IN AN ACTION FOR HEALTH CARE MALPRACTICE FILED
AFTER OCTOBER 1, 199
4 IS LACK OF INFORMED CONSENT, THE ACTION SHALL BE
DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, IF THE PLAINTIFF FAILS TO FILE WITH THE
COURT IN WHICH THE ACTION WAS FILED A CERTIFICATE OF A QUALIFIED EXPERT
ATTESTING TO A DEPARTURE FROM STANDARDS OF CARE AND THAT THE
DEPARTURE IS THE PROXIMATE CAUSE OF THE ALLEGED INJURY.

(II) THE PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE THE CERTIFICATE WITHIN 90 DAYS
FROM THE DATE OF THE COMPLAINT.

(III) THE PLAINTIFF SHALL SERVE A COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ON
ALL OTHER PARTIES TO THE ACTION OR THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MARYLAND RULES
:

(2) IN LIEU OF DISMISSING THE ACTION, THE COURT SHALL GRANT AN
EXTENSION OF NO MORE THAN 90 DAYS FOR FILING THE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED
BY THIS SUBSECTION IF:

(I) THE LIMITATIONS PERIOD APPLICABLE TO THE ACTION HAS
EXPIRED; AND

(II) THE FAILURE TO FILE THE CERTIFICATE WAS NEITHER
WILLFUL NOR THE RESULT OF GROSS NEGLIGENCE.

(B) (1) UNLESS THE SOLE ISSUE IN AN ACTION FOR HEALTH CARE
MALPRACTICE FILED AFTER OCTOBER 1, 199
4 IS LACK OF INFORMED CONSENT, THE
ACTION MAY BE ADJUDICATED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF ON THE ISSUE OF
LIABILITY IF THE DEFENDANT DISPUTES LIABILITY AND FAILS TO FILE A

- 3337 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1995
Volume 793, Page 3337   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives