clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1995
Volume 793, Page 1483   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

PARRIS N. GLENDENING, Governor

Ch. 110

(4) (5) (I) A DEFENDANT IN A CASE IN WHICH A SENTENCE OF
DEATH HAS BEEN IMPOSED MAY WAIVE THE RIGHT TO FILE A PETITION UNDER
THIS SUBHEADING PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE 180 DAY 210-DAY PERIOD
ESTABLISHED IN PARAGRAPH (3) OF THIS SUBSECTION PROVIDED THAT THE
WAIVER IS:

1. KNOWING, VOLUNTARY, AND INTELLIGENT; AND

2. IN WRITING,

(II) A WAIVER UNDER SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH
MAY BE REVOKED NO LATER THAN 15 DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED DATE OF
EXECUTION BY;

1. FILING A PETITION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF UNDER
THIS SECTION SUBHEADING; OR

2. WITHDRAWING THE WAIVER IN WRITING.

(II) (III) A WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO FILE A PETITION UNDER
THIS SUBHEADING PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE 180 DAY 210-DAY PERIOD
ESTABLISHED IN PARAGRAPH (3) OF THIS SUBSECTION SHALL CONCLUDE THE
STATE POSTCONVICTION REVIEW PROCESS FOR THE PURPOSES OF § 75 OF THIS
ARTICLE.

(IV)    THE REVOCATION OF A WAIVER UNDER SUBPARAGRAPH (II)1
OF THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL CONTINUE THE STATE POSTCONVICTION REVIEW
PROCESS FOR THE PURPOSES OF § 75 OF THIS ARTICLE.

(V)     THE REVOCATION OF A WAIVER UNDER SUBPARAGRAPH (II)2
OF THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL CONTINUE THE STATE POSTCONVICTION REVIEW
PROCESS FOR THE PURPOSES OF § 75 OF THIS ARTICLE UNTIL THE FILING OF A
PETITION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF OR THE EXPIRATION OF THE 180 DAY
210-DAY PERIOD ESTABLISHED IN PARAGRAPH (3) OF THIS SUBSECTION, WHICHEVER
OCCURS FIRST.

(b)     For the purposes of this subtitle, an allegation of error shall be deemed to be
finally litigated when an appellate court of the State has rendered a decision on the
merits thereof, either upon direct appeal or upon any consideration of an application for
leave to appeal filed pursuant to § 645-I of this subtitle; or when a court of original
jurisdiction, after a full and fair hearing, has rendered a decision on the merits thereof
upon a petition for a writ of habeas corpus or a writ of error coram nobis, unless said
decision upon the merits of such petition is clearly erroneous.

(c)      (1) For the purposes of this subtitle, an allegation of error shall be deemed
to be waived when a petitioner could have made, but intelligently and knowingly failed to
make, such allegation before trial, at trial, on direct appeal (whether or not the petitioner
actually took such an appeal), in an application for leave to appeal a conviction based on
a guilty plea, in any habeas corpus or coram nobis proceeding actually instituted by said

- 1483 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1995
Volume 793, Page 1483   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives