clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1994
Volume 773, Page 3804   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

H.B. 256

VETOES

(iii) It finds that the individual's or child's employment would be
adversely affected because the individual or child has no reasonable alternative means of
transportation to or from a place of employment; or

(iv) It finds that the individual's or child's education would be
adversely affected because the individual or child has no reasonable alternative means of
transportation for educational purposes.

SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That the publishers of the
Annotated Code of Maryland shall, in consultation with the Department of Legislative
Reference, correct any cross-references to the provisions of Article 27 of the Code
affected by this Act.

SECTION 3. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect
October 1, 1994.

May 26, 1994

The Honorable Casper R. Taylor, Jr.

Speaker of the House

State House

Annapolis, Maryland 21401

Dear Mr. Speaker:

In accordance with Article II, Section 17 of the Maryland Constitution, I have today
vetoed House Bill 256.

House Bill 256 would prohibit all "bring your own bottle" (BYOB) clubs in Worcester
County established after January 1, 1994. Any BYOB club in existence before that date
would be allowed to continue operating. As underscored by the Attorney. General's
review letter of May 19, 1994, House Bill 256 creates confusion because the existing
statute, Article 2B, Section 86(k), already prohibits such establishments, in Worcester
County.

The bill "grandfathers" BYOB establishments that were in operation on, or prior to,
January 1, 1994. It appears, however, that if such establishments were in operation prior
to that time, they existed in violation of the statute. If the intent of House Bill 256 was to
clarify the application of the statute in Worcester County, then the provision
grandfathering apparently illegal BYOB establishments should not have been included.

House Bill 256 is ambiguous, given the language of the existing statute. If a problem exists
with the interpretation of the statute in Worcester County, then a more clearly crafted bill
is needed in order clarify the intent of this prohibition.

For this reason, I have vetoed House Bill 256.

Sincerely,

William Donald Schaefer

Governor

- 3804 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1994
Volume 773, Page 3804   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives