clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1994
Volume 773, Page 2271   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

WILLIAM DONALD SCHAEFER, Governor                            Ch. 475

(iv) A governmental entity incurred expenses in the removal, towing,
transporting, preserving, storage, sale, or destruction of an abandoned vehicle;

(v) The Criminal Injuries Compensation Board paid benefits to a
victim of the crime; or

(vi) The Department of Health and Mental Hygiene or other
governmental entity paid expenses incurred under § 765 of this article.

(2)      [On conviction of a crime, acceptance of a plea of nolo contendere, or
imposition of probation before judgment under § 641 of this article, the court may] A
COURT SHALL issue an order of A VICTIM IS PRESUMED TO HAVE A RIGHT TO restitution
[directing the defendant to make restitution in addition to any other penalty for the
commission of the crime] UNDER PARAGRAPH (1) OF THIS SUBSECTION if:

(i) The victim or the State on behalf of the victim requests restitution;
[and]

(ii) The court is presented with competent evidence of any of items (i)
through [(v)] (VI) of paragraph (1) of this subsection; AND

(III) THE DEFENDANT HAS THE ABILITY TO PAY THE RESTITUTION
ORDER.

(3)      (I) A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION EXISTS THAT A DEFENDANT
HAS THE ABILITY TO PAY A RESTITUTION ORDER.

(II) THE PRESUMPTION ESTABLISHED UNDER ITEM (I) OF THIS
PARAGRAPH MAY BE REBUTTED IF IT IS ESTABLISHED THAT THE DEFENDANT HAS A
MENTAL OR PHYSICAL DISABILITY THAT PREVENTS THE DEFENDANT FROM
EARNING THE AMOUNT NECESSARY TO SATISFY THE ORDER OF RESTITUTION AND
THE DEFENDANT DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT ASSETS TO OTHERWISE SATISFY THE
ORDER OF RESTITUTION.

(III) THE PRESUMPTION ESTABLISHED UNDER ITEM (I) OF THIS
PARAGRAPH MAY NOT BE REBUTTED BY ESTABLISHING THAT A DEFENDANT IS OR
WILL BE INCARCERATED
A COURT NEED NOT ISSUE AN ORDER OF RESTITUTION
UNDER THIS SECTION IF THE COURT FINDS GOOD CAUSE TO ESTABLISH EXTENUATING
CIRCUMSTANCES AS TO WHY AN ORDER OF RESTITUTION IS INAPPROPRIATE IN A CASE.

[(3)] (4) The court may order that restitution be made to:

(i) The victim;

(ii) The Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, the Criminal
Injuries Compensation Board, or any other governmental entity; or

(iii) A third-party payor, including an insurer, which has made
payment to the victim to compensate the victim for a property loss or pecuniary loss under
this subsection.

- 2271 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1994
Volume 773, Page 2271   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives