clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1993
Volume 772, Page 2032   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

1993 LAWS OF MARYLAND

20A-502. POWERS AND DUTIES; SURROGATE DECISION MAKER.

(A)     UNDER THIS SUBTITLE, A SURROGATE DECISION MAKER SHALL MAKE A
HEALTH CARE DECISION THAT REFLECTS A MEDICALLY INFORMED SUBSTITUTED
JUDGMENT.

(B)     (1) A SURROGATE DECISION MAKER WHO CANNOT MAKE A HEALTH
CARE DECISION UNDER SUBSECTION (A) OF THIS SECTION SHALL MAKE A HEALTH
CARE DECISION THAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE INCAPACITATED
INDIVIDUAL.

(2)     THE SURROGATE DECISION MAKER MAY NOT CONSIDER A
PREEXISTING PHYSICAL OR MENTAL. DISABILITY OF THE INCAPACITATED
INDIVIDUAL THAT HAS NO EFFECT ON THE MEDICAL CONDITION THAT WOULD BE
THE SUBJECT OF TREATMENT.

(C) A SURROGATE DECISION MAKER MAY NOT EXERCISE AUTHORITY
UNDER THIS SUBTITLE ON BEHALF OF AN INDIVIDUAL IF:

(1) THE INDIVIDUAL IS COMPETENT;

(2)     THE HEALTH CARE DECISION IS. WITHIN THE SCOPE OF A POWER OF
ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE DECISIONS VALID UNDER THIS SUBTITLE; OR

(3) A GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON HAS BEEN APPOINTED FOR THE
INDIVIDUAL UNDER § 13-704 OF THE ESTATES AND TRUSTS ARTICLE AND HAS BEEN
GRANTED AUTHORITY OVER THE HEALTH CARE OF THE INDIVIDUAL.

(D) A SURROGATE DECISION MAKER MAY NOT MAKE A HEALTH CARE
DECISION THAT THE SURROGATE DECISION MAKER HAS REASON TO BELIEVE IS
CONTRARY TO THE RELIGIOUS OR MORAL BELIEFS HELD BY THE INCAPACITATED
INDIVIDUAL.

(E) A SURROGATE DECISION MAKER MAY NOT INSTRUCT THAT A
LIFE-SUSTAINING PROCEDURE BE WITHHELD OR WITHDRAWN FROM AN
INCAPACITATED INDIVIDUAL WHO IS IN NEITHER A TERMINAL CONDITION NOR A
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE.

20A 503. SAME; HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.

(A) A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER SHALL CERTIFY A HEALTH CARE DECISION
OF A SURROGATE DECISION MAKER UNDER THIS SUBTITLE.

(B) A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER MAY NOT CARRY OUT A HEALTH CARE
DECISION OF A SURROGATE DECISION MAKER IF:

(1) A SECOND SURROGATE DECISION MAKER HAS INFORMED THE
HEALTH CARE PROVIDER IN WRITING THAT THE SECOND SURROGATE DECISION
MAKER DISAGREES WITH THE HEALTH CARE DECISION; OR

(2) THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER CERTIFIES THAT IT HAS REASON TO
BELIEVE THAT:

- 2032 -

Ch. 372

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1993
Volume 772, Page 2032   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives