clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1993
Volume 772, Page 1715   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

WILLIAM DONALD SCHAEFER, Governor                         Ch. 271

4. THE DEFENDANT HAS NOT OBTAINED A STAY OF THE
DECISION OR ORDER PENDING ANY APPEAL OF THE AGENCY'S DECISION OR
ORDER; AND

5. THE DEFENDANT HAS NOT COMPLIED WITH THE
AGENCY'S DECISION OR ORDER.

(II) THE DEFENDANT MAY NOT CHALLENGE THE FACTUAL
DETERMINATIONS OF THE AGENCY OR THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE AGENCY'S
DECISION OR ORDER IN A MUNICIPAL INFRACTION PROCEEDING.

[(12)] (14) (13) The Court costs in a municipal infraction [case]
PROCEEDING in which costs are imposed are [$5] $15. A defendant [shall] MAY not be
liable for payment to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Fund.

[(13)When a defendant has been found guilty of a municipal infraction and a
fine has been imposed by the Court, the Court may, at its discretion, direct that the
payment of said fine be suspended or deferred under such conditions as the Court may
establish. Whenever any defendant has been found guilty of a municipal infraction and
willfully fails to pay the fine imposed by the Court, that willful failure may be treated as
a criminal contempt of Court, for which the defendant may be punished by the Court as
is provided by law in such cases.

(14) A defendant who has been found guilty of a municipal infraction shall
have the same rights to file a motion for a new trial or a motion for a revision of a
judgment as are now provided by law or rule in the trial of a criminal case. The said
motions shall be made in the same manner as is now provided in the trial of criminal
cases, and the Court, in ruling on said motions, shall have the same authority as is now
provided in the trial of criminal cases.]

(15) ANY APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT IN A
MUNICIPAL INFRACTION PROCEEDING SHALL BE ON THE RECORD MADE BEFORE
THE DISTRICT COURT.

[(15)] (16) (14) The State's Attorney of any county is authorized to
prosecute a municipal infraction [in the same manner as he is now permitted by law to
prosecute a violation of the criminal laws of this State. The State's Attorney] AND is
authorized to enter a nolle prosequi in such cases or to place such cases on the stet
docket[, and he shall exercise that authority in the same manner as is now prescribed by
law or rule for violation of the criminal laws of this State].

[(16)] (17) (15) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph [(15)] (16)
(14) of this subsection, a municipality may designate an attorney to prosecute any
municipal infraction in the same manner as the State's Attorney of any county.

- 1715 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1993
Volume 772, Page 1715   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives