clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1989
Volume 771, Page 4325   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

WILLIAM DONALD SCHAEFER, Governor Ch. 794

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED 1985,
ACCOMPANIED BY A MAP OF THE AREA;

(II) THE PROJECT DOES NOT REQUIRE AN EXPANSION
OF THE PIER GREATER THAN 25 PERCENT OF THE PIER'S ORIGINAL SIZE;
HOWEVER, ADDITIONAL EXPANSION MAY BE ALLOWED IN THE AMOUNT OF 10
PERCENT OF THE WATER COVERAGE ELIMINATED BY REMOVING OTHER PIERS
FROM THE SAME PROPERTY. IF THE HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA OF A PIER
TO BE REMOVED IS NOT INTACT BUT THE REMAINING FILINGS IDENTIFY
ITS PREVIOUS SIZE, THAT AREA MAY BE USED IN DETERMINING THE
ADDITIONAL EXPANSION PERMITTED. THE PROJECT EXPANSION BASED ON

WATER COVERAGE ELIMINATED CAN BE CONSIDERED ONLY IF ALL

NONFUNCTIONAL PIERS ON THE PROPERTY ARE REMOVED EXCEPT FOR THE

PROJECT PIER. IN NO CASE MAY THE TOTAL EXPANSION EXCEED 35

PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL SIZE OF THE PROJECT PIER;

(II) THE PROJECT DOES NOT REQUIRE AN EXPANSION
OF THE PIER GREATER THAN 25 PERCENT OF THE AREA OF PIERS OR DRY
DOCKS REMOVED ON THE SAME PROPERTY; HOWEVER, ADDITIONAL EXPANSION
MAY BE ALLOWED IN THE AMOUNT OF 10 PERCENT OF THE WATER COVERAGE
ELIMINATED BY REMOVING COMPLETE PIERS FROM THE SAME OR OTHER
PROPERTIES. IF THE HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA OF A PIER TO BE
REMOVED IS NOT INTACT BUT THE REMAINING PILINGS IDENTIFY ITS
PREVIOUS SIZE, THAT AREA MAY BE USED IN DETERMINING THE
ADDITIONAL EXPANSION PERMITTED. THE PROJECT EXPANSION BASED ON
WATER COVERAGE ELIMINATED CAN BE CONSIDERED ONLY IF ALL
NONFUNCTIONAL PIERS ON THE PROPERTY ARE REMOVED EXCEPT FOR THE
PROJECT PIER. IN NO CASE SHALL THE TOTAL EXPANSION EXCEED 35
PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL SIZE OF THE PIERS AND DRY DOCKS REMOVED;

(III) THE PROJECT IS APPROVED BY LOCAL PLANNING
AND ZONING AUTHORITIES; AND

(IV) THE PROJECT IS LOCATED IN AN INTENSELY
DEVELOPED AREA, AS DESIGNATED IN PROGRAMS ADOPTED OR APPROVED BY
THE CRITICAL AREAS COMMISSION UNDER THIS SUBTITLE.

(3) (4) A LOCAL JURISDICTION MAY ISSUE A BUILDING
PERMIT FOR THE REPAIR OF AN EXISTING DWELLING UNIT OR OTHER
NON-WATER DEPENDENT STRUCTURE ON A PIER LOCATED ON STATE OR
PRIVATE WETLANDS WITHIN THE CRITICAL AREA.

(5) EXCEPT FOR PROJECTS UNDER PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS
SUBSECTION, AND IN ADDITION TO ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS
SECTION, ALL PROJECTS INVOLVING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING
UNIT OR OTHER NON-WATER DEPENDENT FACILITY ON A PIER LOCATED ON
STATE OR PRIVATE WETLANDS WITHIN THE CRITICAL AREA MAY NOT BE
ISSUED A BUILDING PERMIT UNLESS:
-----------------------------------

(I) THE APPLICANT DEMONSTRATES THAT THE
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A LONG
TERM ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE WATER QUALITY OF THE ADJACENT BODY OF

- 4325 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1989
Volume 771, Page 4325   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives