developer;

persons;

WILLIAM DONALD SCHAEFER, Governor                      Ch. 89

(ii) The lack of good faith on the part of the

(iii) The adverse impact, if any, on other

(iv) Any efforts made by the developer to
remedy or correct the violation; and

(v) The developer's history of prior
violations, particularly violations of the same or similar
nature.

(3) (i) If any penalty is not paid in full within 30
days after becoming final, the Commission may summarily revoke
the developer's registration, and the Commission or the State
Central Collection Unit may bring suit in the District Court or
other court of competent jurisdiction to enforce payment.

(ii) A judgment shall be entered against the
developer upon a showing that:

1.  The penalty was assessed against the
developer;

2.  The penalty has become final;

3.  No appeal is pending;

4.  The penalty remains unpaid in whole or
part; and

5.  The developer contested the charge for
which the penalty was assessed, or was duly served with a copy of
the charge under any applicable rules and regulations of the
Commission.

DRAFTER'S NOTE:

Error: Function paragraph of bill being cured
indicated that § 11A-121(f), (g), (h), and (i), of the
Real Property Article was renumbered to be §
11A-121(h), (i), (j), and (k), but renumbering was not
reflected in the body of the bill.

Occurred: Ch. 563 (Senate Bill 201) of the Acts of
1988.

Noted by: The Computer Division of the Department of
Legislative Reference.

Article - State Finance and Procurement
- 1719 -