clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1988
Volume 770, Page 622   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

Ch. 2                                    LAWS OF MARYLAND

The Tax - General Article Review Committee urges that the
General Assembly carefully review the provisions of this subtitle
relating to criminal penalties. The current Maryland statutes
with respect to criminal violations of the tax laws are a
hodgepodge of inconsistent, overlapping, and underlapping
provisions, seemingly enacted without consideration to an overall
structure and coherence in the definitions and the punishments
for criminal activity in Maryland. This note sets forth only a
few of the more obvious difficulties with the current pattern.

Statutes with respect to the willful failure to file a
return have been enacted only with respect to the income tax,
admissions and amusement tax, sales tax, and financial
institution franchise tax. Other tax statutes do not contain a
provision penalizing the willful failure to file a return.

Some of the criminal statutes (e.g., §§ 13-1002 and 13-1004)
include, as part of the definition of criminal activity, "intent
to evade". Other criminal statutes do not contain that phrase.
The reader is left with the inference that all of the other
statutes make certain activity criminal, even though there may
not be an "intent to evade the tax".

Many of the sales and use tax criminal statutes impose a
penalty on both the taxpayer and on the officer of any
corporation that is the taxpayer. Other criminal statutes do not
contain any references to "officers of corporations". One is
left to speculate whether the other Maryland statutes are
intended to immunize from criminal liability officers of
corporations who willfully failed to file tax returns or
willfully file false tax returns, leaving the penalties to be
imposed only on the corporation itself. It is doubtful that the
General Assembly intended such a result, but because of the fact
that the sales and use tax provisions specifically refer to
officers of corporations, a reasonable argument can be made that
officers of corporations who evade other types of taxes are not
criminally responsible.

The only statute that makes the filing of a false claim for
refund a crime is § 13-1004 of this subtitle, relating to income
tax. The question is whether the filing of a false claim for
refund in connection with any other tax is not intended to be a
crime.

There seems to be an omission with respect to the willful
failure to pay taxes, as those crimes relate only to admissions
and amusement tax, sales and use tax, and income tax. There
seems to be no specific criminal penalty for failure to pay the
other taxes in the article.

Sections 13-1002 and 13-1004 of this subtitle, relating to
income tax and financial institution franchise tax, refer to the
willful filing or preparation of a false return, whereas §
13-1003 of this subtitle, dealing with admissions and amusement
tax and sales and use tax, refer to the willful making of a false

- 622 -

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1988
Volume 770, Page 622   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives