WILLIAM DONALD SCHAEFER, Governor

Ch. 48

subtitle, which contains more detailed substantive
requirements.

The Procurement Revision Review Committee notes, for
consideration by the General Assembly, that the
language of subsection (a) of this section, which is
carried over from the first sentence of former SF §§
ll-158(a) and ll-176(a), fails to state that the Board
of Public Works has the authority to approve, reject,
or remand the recommendation of the Selection Board.
The General Assembly may wish to remedy this omission.

Defined terms: "Architectural services" § 11-101
"Engineering services" § 11-101
"Procurement contract" § 11-101
"Selection Board" § 13-301

13-316. APPEAL OF RECOMMENDATION.

(A)  ALLOWED.

WITHIN 10 DAYS AFTER AN OFFEROR OF ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES OR
ENGINEERING SERVICES RECEIVES NOTICE OF A RECOMMENDATION BY THE
SELECTION BOARD TO THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS, THE OFFEROR MAY
APPEAL THE RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS.

(B)  ACTION OF BOARD.

ON AN APPEAL UNDER THIS SECTION, THE BOARD SHALL:

(1)  APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION;

(2)  DISAPPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION; OR

(3)  REMAND THE MATTER. TO THE SELECTION BOARD FOR
FURTHER CONSIDERATION.

REVISOR'S NOTE: This section is new language derived
without substantive change from the second and third
sentences of former SF § ll-137(g).

In the introductory language to subsection (b) of this
section, the word "shall" is substituted for the
former word "may", to clarify that the Board is
required to do 1 of the 3 acts listed in that
subsection.

Former SF § ll-137(b)(4) made Title 10, Subtitle 2 of
the State Government Article inapplicable to the
disposition of "complaints" under that former section.
Since former § ll-137(g) did not contain the word
"complaint" and the first sentence of former §

- 1669 -