clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1986
Volume 768, Page 3656   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

3656

VETOES

The sales tax is the second largest source of revenue for
the State general fund, with an estimated $1.2 billion to be
collected in Fiscal Year 1987. It is estimated that for Fiscal
Year 1987 there will be 2,500 refund claims paid for a total of
$7 million.

The Comptroller cites several problems which would result
from this bill. Although some State taxes provide for the
payment of interest on tax refunds, they consistently preclude
the payment of interest when the claim results from taxpayer
error. The failure of this bill to preclude interest based on
taxpayer error creates an incentive for taxpayers not to claim
exemptions from vendors at the time of purchase. In addition, a
shorter time frame (30 days) for payment of a sales tax refund is
provided in the bill than is applicable for income tax refunds
(45 days).

Another problem with this legislation relates to the State's
right to recover overpayment of refunds. In the case of the
income tax, is a refund is paid in error, the State may recover
overpayments for a period of 3 years. However, Senate Bill 291
provides that in the case of the sales tax the payment of a
refund is a final action. As a consequence, if the Comptroller
authorizes a sales tax refund, the State may not thereafter
recover a subsequently discovered overpayment.

I am sympathetic with the purpose of this bill, which is to
establish a system of interest on sales tax refunds. However,
this system should be created in a manner which will not harm the
administration of that tax. Therefore, the Comptroller has
agreed to work with the sponsor of the vetoed bill and draft
departmental legislation for introduction in the 1987 Session of
the General Assembly which will provide interest on sales tax
refunds on a basis parallel to that of the income tax.

Therefore, for the above reasons, I have decided to veto
Senate Bill 291

Sincerely,
Harry Hughes
Governor

Senate Bill No. 291

AN ACT concerning

Retail Sales and Use Taxes - Refunds - Interest

FOR the purpose of requiring the Comptroller to pay interest at a
certain rate on documented claims for refunds due under the
Retail Sales and Use Tax Acts; and generally relating to the
computation of interest due on refunds under the Retail
Sales and Use Tax.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1986
Volume 768, Page 3656   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 17, 2024
Maryland State Archives