clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1984
Volume 759, Page 3975   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

HARRY HUGHES, Governor

3975

an essential executive power, the bill violates the separation of
powers clause. Accordingly, we are unable to approve these
bills.

Article 8 of the Declaration of Rights provides as follows:

"That the Legislative, Executive and Judicial powers of
Government ought to be forever separate and distinct from
each other; and no person exercising the functions of one of
said Departments shall assume or discharge the duties of any
other."

In interpreting this article, this office has said that it means
that

"...one branch may not usurp the essential functions and
powers of another branch, may not act to destroy the
essential functions and powers of another branch, and may
not delegate its essential functions and powers to another
branch."
(citations omitted).

63 Opinions of the Attorney General 305, 310 (1978). However,
this office has recognized that the authority of each branch is
absolute only with respect to its core powers. Beyond these core
areas, there is a twilight in which the branches have concurrent
power. Ibid. The issue here is whether the certification of
State projects for the solicitation of private donations in
accordance with certain criteria is an essential executive
function which can not be usurped by the legislative branch.

In a prior bill review letter, it was noted that

"While the cases define 'Executive Power' only in
quite general terms, it is clear that the essential
attribute of this power is the power to carry out,
implement and administer laws. It is this essen-
tial core power which the separation of powers
doctrine protects from usurpation of another
branch."

Letter of May 26, 1979 from Attorney General Sachs to Governor
Hughes concerning House Bill 1589. As the selection of an
organization to perform a study mandated by statute could
reasonably be regarded as an exercise of executive power, it was
concluded that a statutory requirement that a legislative
committee concur in the selection was an usurpation of executive
power in violation of the separation of powers clause. Likewise,
we conclude that the certification, in accordance with certain
criteria, of State projects for which private donations may be
solicited is the implementation of policy and is thus an exercise
of an essential executive function which may not be usurped by
the legislative branch.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1984
Volume 759, Page 3975   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 17, 2024
Maryland State Archives