clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2005
Volume 752, Page 3734   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
S.B. 580 VETOES
(1)      A CONTRACTUAL RIGHT TO TERMINATE, LIQUIDATE, OR CLOSE OUT
ANY NETTING AGREEMENT OR QUALIFIED FINANCIAL CONTRACT WITH AN INSURER
BECAUSE OF: (I)      THE INSOLVENCY, FINANCIAL CONDITION, OR DEFAULT OF
THE INSURER AT ANY TIME, PROVIDED THAT THE RIGHT IS ENFORCEABLE UNDER
APPLICABLE LAW OTHER THAN THIS SUBTITLE; OR (II)     THE COMMENCEMENT OF A DELINQUENCY PROCEEDING
UNDER THIS SUBTITLE; (2)      ANY RIGHT UNDER A PLEDGE, SECURITY, COLLATERAL, OR
GUARANTEE AGREEMENT OR ANY OTHER SIMILAR SECURITY ARRANGEMENT OR
CREDIT SUPPORT DOCUMENT RELATING TO A NETTING AGREEMENT OR QUALIFIED
FINANCIAL CONTRACT; OR (3)      SUBJECT TO ANY PROVISION OF § 9-229(B) OF THIS SUBTITLE, ANY
RIGHT TO OFFSET OR NET OUT ANY TERMINATION VALUE, PAYMENT AMOUNT, OR
OTHER TRANSFER OBLIGATION ARISING UNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH A
NETTING AGREEMENT OR QUALIFIED FINANCIAL CONTRACT IF THE COUNTERPARTY
OR ITS GUARANTOR IS ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES, A
STATE, OR A FOREIGN JURISDICTION APPROVED BY THE SECURITIES VALUATION
OFFICE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE COMMISSIONERS AS
ELIGIBLE FOR NETTING. (C)     (1) NOTWITHSTANDING A PROVISION IN A NETTING AGREEMENT THAT
THE NONDEFAULTING PARTY IS NOT REQUIRED TO PAY ANY NET OR SETTLEMENT
AMOUNT DUE TO THE DEFAULTING PARTY, ON TERMINATION OF THE NETTING
AGREEMENT, THE NET OR SETTLEMENT AMOUNT, IF ANY, OWED BY A
NONDEFAULTING PARTY TO AN INSURER AGAINST WHICH AN APPLICATION OR
PETITION HAS BEEN FILED UNDER THIS SUBTITLE, SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO OR
ON THE ORDER OF THE RECEIVER FOR THE INSURER, EVEN IF THE INSURER IS THE
DEFAULTING PARTY. (2)      ANY LIMITED TWO-WAY PAYMENT PROVISION IN A NETTING
AGREEMENT WITH AN INSURER THAT HAS DEFAULTED SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A
FULL TWO-WAY PAYMENT PROVISION AS AGAINST THE DEFAULTING INSURER (3)      ANY SUCH NET OR SETTLEMENT AMOUNT SHALL BE A GENERAL
ASSET OF THE INSURER, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT SUCH NET OR SETTLEMENT
AMOUNT IS SUBJECT TO ONE OR MORE SECONDARY LIENS OR ENCUMBRANCES. (D)     IN MAKING A TRANSFER OF A NETTING AGREEMENT OR QUALIFIED
FINANCIAL CONTRACT OF AN INSURER SUBJECT TO A DELINQUENCY PROCEEDING
UNDER THIS SUBTITLE, THE RECEIVER SHALL: (1) TRANSFER TO ONE PARTY, OTHER THAN AN INSURER SUBJECT TO A
DELINQUENCY PROCEEDING UNDER THIS SUBTITLE, ALL NETTING AGREEMENTS
AND QUALIFIED FINANCIAL CONTRACTS BETWEEN A COUNTERPARTY OR AN
AFFILIATE OF A COUNTERPARTY AND THE INSURER THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THE
DELINQUENCY PROCEEDING, INCLUDING: - 3734 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2005
Volume 752, Page 3734   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives