clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2005
Volume 752, Page 3017   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
ROBERT L. EHRLICH, JR., Governor
Ch. 512
(I) THE FINDING BY THE DISTRICT COURT OF A VIOLATION UNDER THIS
TITLE IS NOT A CRIMINAL CONVICTION AND DOES NOT IMPOSE ANY OF THE CIVIL
DISABILITIES ORDINARILY IMPOSED BY A CRIMINAL CONVICTION. Article - Courts and Judicial Proceedings 4-401. Except as provided in § 4-402 of this subtitle, and subject to the venue
provisions of Title 6 of this article, the District Court has exclusive original civil
jurisdiction in: (10) A proceeding for adjudication of: (xi) A subdivision violation for which a civil penalty has been
provided in accordance with Article 66B, § 14.07(f) of the Code; [or] (xii) A violation under Title 10, Subtitle 1, Part III of the Criminal
Law Article; OR (XIII) A CIVIL INFRACTION RELATING TO THE STORAGE OF TOBACCO
PRODUCTS UNDER ARTICLE 24, TITLE 15 OF THE CODE; SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect
October 1, 2005. Approved May 26, 2005.
CHAPTER 512
(Senate Bill 873) AN ACT concerning Criminal Procedure - Restitution FOR the purpose of expanding the circumstances under which a judge may order a
defendant or child respondent to make restitution to include situations in which
the victim suffered certain losses or suffered expenses incurred with
rehabilitation; providing that a certain restitution amount is the absolute limit
for each child's acts arising out of a single incident; adding a person who has
paid an expense on behalf of a victim to the list of third-party payors to whom
the court may order restitution be paid; providing that payment of restitution to
the victim has priority over payments owed to the State for reimbursement of
payments made on behalf of a child; requiring the Division of Correction Parole
and Probation or the Department of Juvenile Services to take certain actions
when a restitution obligor's restitution payment is overdue under certain
circumstances; repealing a certain qualifier that a judgment of restitution must
be recorded and indexed in the civil judgment index before certain actions can be
taken and certain rights exercised; providing that certain provisions do not
apply in Baltimore City; providing that in Baltimore City, a judgment of - 3017 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2005
Volume 752, Page 3017   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives