clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2005
Volume 752, Page 2635   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
ROBERT L. EHRLICH, JR., Governor                             Ch. 464 (III)   DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE
PERMANENCY PLAN; (IV)    MAKE A SPECIFIC FACTUAL FINDING ON WHETHER
REASONABLE EFFORTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO FINALIZE THE CHILD'S PERMANENCY
PLAN AND DOCUMENT THE FINDING; (V)     SUBJECT TO SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION, CHANGE THE
CHILD'S PERMANENCY PLAN IF A CHANGE WOULD BE IN THE CHILD'S BEST
INTERESTS; (VI)    PROJECT A REASONABLE DATE BY WHICH THE PERMANENCY
PLAN WILL BE FINALIZED; (VII)  ENTER ANY ORDER THAT THE JUVENILE COURT FINDS
APPROPRIATE TO IMPLEMENT THE PERMANENCY PLAN; AND (VIII) TAKE ALL OTHER ACTION THAT THE JUVENILE COURT
CONSIDERS TO BE IN THE CHILD'S BEST INTERESTS, INCLUDING ANY ORDER
ALLOWED UNDER § 5-324(B)(l)(II) OF THIS SUBTITLE. (9)      A JUVENILE COURT MAY APPROVE A PERMANENCY PLAN OTHER
THAN ADOPTION OF A CHILD ONLY IF THE JUVENILE COURT FINDS THAT, FOR A
COMPELLING REASON, ADOPTION IS NOT IN THE CHILD'S BEST INTERESTS. (10)    (I) AT A GUARDIANSHIP REVIEW HEARING HELD 1 YEAR OR MORE
AFTER A JUVENILE COURT ENTERS AN ORDER FOR GUARDIANSHIP OF A CHILD, THE
JUVENILE COURT MAY DESIGNATE AN INDIVIDUAL GUARDIAN OF THE CHILD IF: 1.       THE LOCAL DEPARTMENT CERTIFIES THE CHILD'S
SUCCESSFUL PLACEMENT WITH THE INDIVIDUAL UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE
LOCAL DEPARTMENT OR ITS AGENT FOR AT LEAST 180 DAYS OR A SHORTER PERIOD
ALLOWED BY THE JUVENILE COURT ON RECOMMENDATION OF THE LOCAL
DEPARTMENT; 2.       THE LOCAL DEPARTMENT FILES A REPORT BY A CHILD
PLACEMENT AGENCY, COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEPARTMENT
REGULATIONS, AS TO THE SUITABILITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL TO BE THE CHILD'S
GUARDIAN; AND 3.       THE JUVENILE COURT MAKES A SPECIFIC FINDING THAT: A.       FOR A COMPELLING REASON, ADOPTION IS NOT IN THE
CHILD'S BEST INTERESTS; AND B.       CUSTODY AND GUARDIANSHIP BY THE INDIVIDUAL IS IN
THE CHILD'S BEST INTERESTS AND IS THE LEAST RESTRICTIVE ALTERNATIVE
AVAILABLE. (II) DESIGNATION OF A GUARDIAN UNDER THIS PARAGRAPH
TERMINATES THE LOCAL DEPARTMENT'S LEGAL OBLIGATIONS AND
RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE CHILD. - 2635 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2005
Volume 752, Page 2635   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives