clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2005
Volume 752, Page 1043   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
ROBERT L. EHRLICH, JR., Governor
Ch. 167
(ii) Does not substantially interfere with the timely and efficacious
administration of the test; and (iii) Is given by the person: 1.       Before the delay in testing would materially affect the
outcome of the test; and 2.       A. For the purpose of a test for determining alcohol
concentration, within 2 hours of the person's apprehension; or B. For the purpose of a test for determining the drug or
controlled dangerous substance content of the person's blood, within 4 hours of the
person's apprehension. (3)     In determining whether a person has withdrawn an initial refusal for
the purposes of paragraph (1) of this subsection, among the factors that the
Administration shall consider are the following: (i) Whether the test would have been administered properly: 1.       For the purpose of a test for determining alcohol
concentration, within 2 hours of the person's apprehension; or 2.       For the purpose of a test for determining the drug or
controlled dangerous substance content of the person's blood, within 4 hours of the
person's apprehension; (ii) Whether a qualified person, as defined in § 10-304 of the
Courts Article, to administer the test and testing equipment were readily available; (iii) Whether the delay in testing would have interfered with the
administration of a test to another person; (iv) Whether the delay in testing would have interfered with the
attention to other duties of the arresting officer or a qualified person, as defined in §
10-304 of the Courts Article; (v) Whether the person's subsequent consent to take the test was
made in good faith; and (vi) Whether the consent after the initial refusal was while the
person was still in police custody. (4)     In determining whether a person has withdrawn an initial refusal for
the purposes of paragraph (1) of this subsection, the burden of proof rests with the
person to establish by a preponderance of the evidence the requirements of paragraph
(2) of this subsection. (h) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, if a driver's license is
suspended based on multiple administrative offenses of refusal to take a test, or a test
to determine alcohol concentration taken that indicated an alcohol concentration of
0.08 or more at the time of testing, or any combination of these administrative - 1043 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2005
Volume 752, Page 1043   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives