clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 3798   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
VETOES
H.B. 1215
House Bill 1215, as originally introduced, sought to increase the maximum principal
amount of bonds outstanding issued by the Baltimore City Board of School
Commissioners. The House of Delegates passed the bill in its original form without
amendments and sent the bill to the Senate. After the State Board of Education
meeting on March 29, where the Board voted to restructure 11 severely failing middle
and high schools in the Baltimore City Public School System, the Senate Budget and
Taxation Committee drastically amended the bill in one day and sent the bill to the
Senate floor for a full vote absent any substantive public deliberation by parents,
students, teachers, advocates, the State Board of Education and the State
Department of Education. The Maryland General Assembly disregarded the normal
and long established legislative procedures that are in place to ensure adequate
discussion of legislation by interested stakeholders and experts. Ironically, the Senate
Education, Health, and Environmental Affairs Committee actually held its hearing on
this matter with a similar bill after House Bill 1215 was passed by the General
Assembly and presented to my office. In its current form, House Bill 1215, which may violate the Constitution of Maryland
and other laws, would prohibit the State Board of Education and the State
Superintendent of Schools from implementing badly needed restructuring efforts in
Baltimore City public schools until May 30, 2007. The major restructuring efforts
referenced in the bill include changes to a school's governance, such as removing a
school from the control of the Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners.
Specifically, the bill blocks or delays the actions taken last month by the State Board
of Education to improve Baltimore City schools. Implementation of this bill will
circumvent the authority of the Maryland State Board of Education, lock children into
a failed system, and may jeopardize $171 Million in federal funding for all of
Maryland's local school systems. I am deeply concerned that House Bill 1215 would delay the urgent help we must
deliver to the principals, teachers and children in these schools. The State Board of
Education's actions, particularly for the 11 high schools and middle schools, are
critical and must begin as soon as possible since the current ninth graders and all of
the middle school students must pass the High School Assessments in order to receive
Maryland High School diplomas. Students graduating in the spring of 2009 will be
the first to be affected by the requirements, and unfortunately, the pass rates for the
four identified Baltimore City high schools and the seven identified middle schools
are not at all hopeful. Lead-time is critical in helping implement a viable curriculum
and strong instruction to abate the current tide of failures. The State Board of Education's actions at its March 29 meeting resulted from the
rejection of the Baltimore City Master Plan Update in December. Baltimore City's
Master Plan Update was the only one of the 24 school systems' plans that was
rejected. The system was asked to rewrite the Update and resubmit it in March with
a promise to review the Update and respond as soon as possible. This Update was
designed to guide the system for the current 2005-2006 school year. The Maryland
State Board of Education found that the rewritten Update was better, but unrealistic
and helped identify many problems organizationally and programmatically in the
system. The Master Plan is required for a school system to receive the additional
Thornton dollars. In Baltimore City's case, this represents $200 million over five - 3798 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 3798   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 17, 2024
Maryland State Archives