clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 3313   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
ROBERT L. EHRLICH, JR., Governor                            S.B. 796
(2) IF A TRIAL JUDGE FINDS A SUBSTANTIAL FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
A PROVISION OTHER THAN § 8-102(B) OF THIS TITLE IN SELECTING A TRIAL JURY AND
THE FAILURE IS LIKELY TO BE PREJUDICIAL TO THE MOVANT, THE TRIAL JUDGE
SHALL STAY THE PROCEEDING PENDING SELECTION OF A TRIAL JURY IN
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS TITLE. COMMITTEE NOTE: This section is new language derived without substantive
change from former CJ § 8-211(a), (c), and (d) and the first sentence of (e),
as they related to criminal cases. In subsections (a) and (b)(1) of this section, the word "party" is substituted
for the former references to "the defendant or State's Attorney, as the case
may be" and "a person accused of a crime [or] the State's Attorney", to
encompass cases that, e.g., the Attorney General prosecutes. In subsection (a) of this section, reference to noncompliance with
requirements for summoning a jury are added to conform to Md. Rule
4-312(a) but the word "otherwise" is added to modify "selected", to clarify
that summoning is part of the overall selection process. In subsections (b)(1) and (e)(1)(ii) and (2)(ii) of this section, the term
"charging document" is substituted for the former, more limited term
"indictment", as an information can be used in a circuit court case. In subsections (b)(1) and (f) of this section, references to a "trial" jury are
substituted for the former references to a "petit" jury, in accordance with
the Council on Jury Use and Management's preference for language more
understandable to the public. In subsection (b)(1) of this section, reference to challenges after a jury is
sworn is added to conform to Md. Rule 4-312(a). Also in subsection (b)(1) of this section, the term "voir dire", which formerly
modified "examination", is deleted in accordance with the Council on Jury
Use and Management recommendation as the term "is unnecessary and
mystifying to potential jurors, litigants and other lay people". Subsection (c) of this section is revised to state expressly that the decision
on access is the trial judge's. In subsection (d) of this section, the former references to a "clerk" are
deleted as unnecessary in light of the newly defined term "jury
commissioner". In subsections (e) and (f) of this section, references to a "trial judge" are
substituted for the former references to a "court" as then defined, a circuit
court to avoid the inference that a majority of the judges of a circuit court
must concur. As to "include", see Art. 1, § 30 of the Code. Defined term: "Jury commissioner" § 8-101                                              - 3313 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 3313   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 17, 2024
Maryland State Archives