clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 1687   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
ROBERT L. EHRLICH, JR., Governor                             Ch. 300 where all of the parties to the communication have given prior consent to the
interception unless the communication is intercepted for the purpose of committing
any criminal or tortious act in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United
States or of this State. (4)     (i) It is lawful under this subtitle for a law enforcement officer in
the course of the officer's regular duty to intercept an oral communication if: 1.       The law enforcement officer initially lawfully detained a
vehicle during a criminal investigation or for a traffic violation; 2.       The law enforcement officer is a party to the oral
communication; 3.       The law enforcement officer has been identified as a law
enforcement officer to the other parties to the oral communication prior to any
interception; 4.       The law enforcement officer informs all other parties to
the communication of the interception at the beginning of the communication; and 5.       The oral interception is being made as part of a video tape
recording. (ii) If all of the requirements of subparagraph (i) of this paragraph
are met, an interception is lawful even if a person becomes a party to the
communication following: 1.       The identification required under subparagraph (i)3 of
this paragraph; or 2.       The informing of the parties required under subparagraph
(i)4 of this paragraph. (5)     It is lawful under this subtitle for an officer, employee, or agent of a
governmental emergency communications center to intercept a wire, oral, or
electronic communication where the officer, agent, or employee is a party to a
conversation concerning an emergency. (6)     (i) It is lawful under this subtitle for law enforcement personnel to
utilize body wires to intercept oral communications in the course of a criminal
investigation if there is reasonable cause to believe that a law enforcement officer's
safety may be in jeopardy. (ii) Communications intercepted under this paragraph may not be
recorded, and may not be used against the defendant in a criminal proceeding. (7)     It is lawful under this subtitle for a person: (i) To intercept or access an electronic communication made
through an electronic communication system that is configured so that the electronic
communication is readily accessible to the general public; - 1687 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 1687   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives