clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 1379   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
ROBERT L. EHRLICH, JR., Governor                             Ch. 233 (iv) Require an independent evaluation or call an impartial expert
witness in the diagnosis or education of students with disabilities whose testimony
shall be on the record and whose costs shall be paid by the State Education Agency;
and (v) Administer oaths to witnesses at the hearing on request of a
party. (2)     The provisions of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act and
34 C.F.R. Part 99 shall apply to school records sought by the impartial expert witness. (3)     If the parties cannot agree on an impartial expert witness, each party
shall be given the opportunity to submit a list of possible experts, and the
administrative law judge shall decide which impartial expert witness to call. [(e)] (F) (1) Any party to the hearing has the right to: (i) Be accompanied and be advised by counsel and individuals with
special knowledge or training with respect to the problems of children with
disabilities; (ii) Present evidence and confront, cross-examine, and compel the
attendance of witnesses; (iii) Prohibit the introduction of any evidence at the hearing which
has not been disclosed to all parties at least 5 days before the hearing; (iv) Obtain a written or electronic verbatim record of the hearing;
and (v) Obtain written findings of fact and decisions. (2) Parents involved in the hearings must be given the right to: (i) Have the child who is the subject of the hearing present; and (ii) Open the hearing to the public. (G) (1) THE DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE SHALL BE
MADE ON SUBSTANTIVE GROUNDS BASED ON THE DETERMINATION OF WHETHER
THE CHILD RECEIVED A FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION. (2) IN MATTERS ALLEGING A PROCEDURAL VIOLATION, AN
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE MAY FIND THAT THE CHILD DID NOT RECEIVE A FREE
APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION ONLY IF THE PROCEDURAL INADEQUACIES MEET
THE CONDITIONS ESTABLISHED IN FEDERAL LAW; (I) IMPEDED THE CHILD'S RIGHT TO A FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC
EDUCATION; (II) SIGNIFICANTLY IMPEDED THE PARENTS' OPPORTUNITY TO
PARTICIPATE IN THE EDUCATIONAL DECISION-MAKING PROCESS REGARDING THE
PROVISION OF A FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION TO THE PARENTS' CHILD; - 1379 -


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 2006
Volume 750, Page 1379   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives