clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1982
Volume 742, Page 360   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

360

LAWS OF MARYLAND

Ch. 21

For example, former Article 59A, § 10(b) required the
Director to provide for a comprehensive evaluation within 60
days of receipt of an application, while former Article 59A,
§ 11(b) did not have any time constraint for doing the
comprehensive evaluation. Former Article 59A, § 11,
however, required that the evaluation be done at a
designated facility.

Similarly, under former Article 59A, § 10(b), the
comprehensive evaluation team considered whether a mentally
retarded individual needs habilitation services and, if so,
determined the least restrictive environment in which the
service can be provided. Under former Article 59A, § 11(b),
the comprehensive evaluation team considered only whether
in-residence treatment is necessary.

Finally, the standards for admission determinations
under former Article 59A, § 10(c) and (d) prohibited
admissions of mentally retarded individuals who do not need
habilitation services, required admission of individuals for
whom a less restrictive form of treatment does not exist,
and required recommendations for individuals who need
nonresidential care. Former Article 59A, § 11(c) prohibited
admissions of mentally retarded individuals who do not need
in-residence care and authorized admission for those who do.

In light of these substantive differences between the
admission procedures in former Article 59A, §§ 10 and 11,
the phrase in former Article 59A, § 10(a), "facility within
the jurisdiction of the Administration", is construed
narrowly in this subtitle and revised to mean only a State
facility.

The Commission also notes that, even before enactment
of Ch. 632, Acts of 1981, former Article 59A, §§ 10 and 11
did not account for admissions to public facilities that
were not within the jurisdiction of the Administration —
e.g., a county or municipal facility. As revised, this
subtitle does not account for those admissions. The General
Assembly may wish to adopt a unified procedure for
admissions to any facility, whether public or private. If,
however, the General Assembly keeps the separate procedures
now set forth in this subtitle, the General Assembly may
wish to provide procedures for admission to a residential
county or municipal facility.

SUBTITLE 6. RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS IN FACILITIES.

PART I. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.

7-601. STATEMENT OF RIGHTS.

(A) POLICY.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1982
Volume 742, Page 360   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 17, 2024
Maryland State Archives