664

LAWS OF MARYLAND

Ch.8

As to the application of this section, the Board
of Review has general jurisdiction over final
decisions of the Board under this subtitle.
Therefore, for some actions, a decision of the
Board of Review is a prerequisite to judicial
review. Subsection (a) of this section reflects
that general procedure. The Board of Review,
however, does not have jurisdiction over any
disciplinary action taken by the Board.
Consequently, subsection (b) of this section
expressly provides for direct judicial review for
persons aggrieved under § 16-312 of this
subtitle.

The new language added in this section better
coordinates the combined requirements of the
Administrative Procedure Act and the laws
regarding the Board of Review. These provisions
apply in any event. No substantive change is
intended.

16-315. AMENDMENT OF ORDER.

FOR REASONS THE BOARD CONSIDERS SUFFICIENT, AND ON THE
AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF ITS MEMBERS THEN SERVING,
THE BOARD MAY:

REVOKED;

(1)  REINSTATE A CERTIFICATION THAT HAS BEEN

(2)  REDUCE THE PERIOD OF A SUSPENSION; OR

(3)  WITHDRAW A REPRIMAND.

REVISOR'S NOTE: This section presently appears as Art.
43, § 636(f).

In the introductory language of this section, the
words "then serving" are added for clarity.

The only other changes are in style.

SUBTITLE 4. PROHIBITED ACTS; PENALTIES.

16-401. MISREPRESENTATION AS PSYCHOLOGIST.

(A)  IN GENERAL.

UNLESS AUTHORIZED OR PERMITTED TO DO SO BY THIS TITLE,
A PERSON MAY NOT USE AS A TITLE OR DESCRIBE THE SERVICES THE
PERSON PROVIDES BY USE OF THE WORDS "PSYCHOLOGICAL",
"PSYCHOLOGIST", OR "PSYCHOLOGY".

(B)  EACH VIOLATION A SEPARATE OFFENSE.

EACH VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS A SEPARATE OFFENSE.