clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1981
Volume 741, Page 467   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

HARRY HUGHES, Governor

467

In subsection (b)(12) and (18) of this section,
the references to preparing a prescription are
substituted for the present references to
"compounding" a prescription to conform with the
terminology used in the definition of "practice
pharmacy" in § 12-101 of this title.

As to subsection (b)(15) of this section, the
reference to "the laws of this State" in present
Art. 43, § 266A(c)(viii) is deleted in light of
the broader provisions of present Art. 43, §
266A(c)(vii) — now subsection (b)(14) of this
section. The task of the Board is the same under
both provisions: to discipline pharmacists who
distribute prescription drugs illegally.

In subsection (b)(17) of this section, the
reference to violating any provision of § 12-603
of this title is substituted for the present
reference to violating "any regulation of the
Board" to clarify that the disciplinary
procedures apply not only to a violation of a
rule or regulation adopted under § 12-603 of this
title but also to a violation of any provision of
§ 12-603 of this title.

In subsection (b)(18) of this—section, the
reference in present Art. 43, § 266A(c)(l)(xi) to
maintaining the professional image of pharmacists
is deleted. Although a state constitutionally
may prohibit advertising claims of professional
superiority, see Bates v. State Bar of Arizona,
433 U.S. 350, 383-84, reh. denied 434 U.S. 881
(1977), maintaining the "professional image of
the pharmacist" is not a sufficient justification
for prohibiting advertising by pharmacists.
Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia
Citizens Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748, 768
(1976).

The balance of present Art. 43, § 266A(a),
concerning the required procedures for hearings,
now appears in § 12-312 of this subtitle.

12-312. SAME — HEARINGS.

(A)  RIGHT TO A HEARING.

EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE
PROCEDURE ACT, BEFORE THE BOARD TAKES ANY ACTION UNDER §
12-311 OF THIS SUBTITLE, IT SHALL GIVE THE INDIVIDUAL
AGAINST WHOM THE ACTION IS CONTEMPLATED AN OPPORTUNITY FOR
A HEARING BEFORE THE BOARD.

(B)  APPLICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT.

THE BOARD SHALL GIVE NOTICE AND HOLD THE HEARING IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1981
Volume 741, Page 467   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives