clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1981
Volume 741, Page 3033   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

HARRY HUGHES, Governor

3033

(IV)  APPROVING OR DISAPPROVING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT; OR

(V)  VOTING ON ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING

MATTERS:

1.  THE DISSOLUTION AND WINDING UP OF
THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP;

2.  THE SALE, EXCHANGE, LEASE,
MORTGAGE, PLEDGE, OR OTHER TRANSFER OF ALL OR SUBSTANTIALLY
ALL THE ASSETS OF THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP;

3.  THE INCURRENCE OF INDEBTEDNESS BY
THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OTHER THAN IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF
ITS BUSINESS;

4.  A CHANGE IN THE NATURE OF ITS
BUSINESS;

5.  THE REMOVAL OF A GENERAL PARTNER;

OR

6.  THE ADMISSION OF A GENERAL OR
LIMITED PARTNER;

(2) THE ENUMERATION IN SUBSECTION (B)(1) OF THIS
SUBSECTION DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT THE POSSESSION OR
EXERCISE OF ANY OTHER POWERS BY A LIMITED PARTNER
CONSTITUTES PARTICIPATION BY THE LIMITED PARTNER IN THE
BUSINESS OF THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.

(C) PERMISSION TO USE NAME. A LIMITED PARTNER WHO
KNOWINGLY PERMITS HIS NAME TO BE USED IN THE NAME OF THE
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, EXCEPT UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES PERMITTED BY
§ 10-102(A)(2) OF THIS TITLE, IS LIABLE TO CREDITORS WHO
EXTEND CREDIT TO THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP WITHOUT ACTUAL
KNOWLEDGE THAT THE LIMITED PARTNER IS NOT A GENERAL PARTNER.

COMMENT

This section makes several important changes in §
10-106(b) of the previous Limited Partnership Act (§ 7 of
the prior uniform law). The first sentence of § 10-303(a)
carries over the basic test from § 10-106(b)(l) of the
previous Limited Partnership Act (§ 7 of the prior uniform
law) — whether the limited partner "takes part in the
control of the business" — in order to insure that judicial
decisions under the prior uniform law remain applicable to
the extent not expressly changed. The second sentence of §
10-303(a) reflects a wholly new concept. Because of the
difficulty of determining when the "control" line has been
overstepped, it was thought unfair to impose general
partner's liability on a limited partner except to the
extent that a third party had knowledge of his participation
in control of the business. On the other hand, in order to
avoid permitting a limited partner to exercise all of the

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1981
Volume 741, Page 3033   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives