|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
|
MARVIN MANDEL, Governor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IN CONVENIENT FORM FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION AND EXAMINATION
DURING REASONABLE BUSINESS HOURS.
16. RECONSIDERATION OF ORDERS.
ANY PERSON AFFECTED BY ANY FINAL ORDER OR DECISION
OF THE COMMISSION MAY, WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER THE
PUBLICATION THEREOF, FILE WITH THE COMMISSION AN
APPLICATION IN WRITING REQUESTING A RECONSIDERATION OF
THE MATTERS INVOLVED, AND STATING SPECIFICALLY THE ERRORS
CLAIMED AS GROUNDS FOR SUCH RECONSIDERATION. NO PERSON
SHALL IN ANY COURT URGE OR RELY ON ANY GROUND NOT SO SET
FORTH IN SUCH APPLICATION. THE COMMISSION, WITHIN
THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF SUCH APPLICATION,
SHALL EITHER GRANT OR DENY IT. IF SUCH APPLICATION IS
GRANTED, THE COMMISSION, AFTER GIVING NOTICE THEREOF TO
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS, SHALL, EITHER WITH OR WITHOUT
HEARING, RESCIND, MODIFY, OR AFFIRM ITS ORDER OR
DECISION. THE FILING OF SUCH AN APPLICATION SHALL ACT
AS A STAY UPON THE EXECUTION OF THE ORDER OR DECISION OF
THE COMMISSION UNTIL THE FINAL ACTION OF THE COMMISSION
UPON THE APPLICATION, EXCEPT THAT UPON WRITTEN CONSENT OF
THE APPLICANT SUCH ORDER OR DECISION SHALL NOT BE STAYED
UNLESS OTHERWISE ORDERED BY THE COMMISSION. NO APPEAL
SHALL LIE FROM ANY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION UNTIL AN
APPLICATION FOR RECONSIDERATION HAS BEEN MADE AND
DETERMINED.
17. JUDICIAL REVIEW.
(A) JURISDICTION; PROCEEDINGS ON APPEAL.
ANY PARTY TO A PROCEEDING UNDER THIS COMPACT
AGGRIEVED BY AN ORDER ISSUED BY THE COMMISSION IN SUCH
PROCEEDING MAY OBTAIN A REVIEW OF SUCH ORDER IN THE COURT
OF APPEALS OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT,
OR IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT
OF COLUMBIA, BY FILING IN SUCH COURT, WITHIN SIXTY (60)
DAYS AFTER THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSION UPON THE
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING, A WRITTEN PETITION PRAYING
THAT THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSION BE MODIFIED OR SET
ASIDE. A COPY OF SUCH PETITION SHALL FORTHWITH BE
SERVED UPON ANY MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION AND THEREUPON
THE COMMISSION SHALL CERTIFY AND FILE WITH THE COURT A
TRANSCRIPT OF THE RECORD UPON WHICH THE ORDER COMPLAINED
OF WAS ENTERED. UPON THE FILING OF SUCH TRANSCRIPT SUCH
COURT SHALL HAVE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION TO AFFIRM,
MODIFY, OR SET ASIDE SUCH ORDER. THE FINDING OF THE
COMMISSION AS TO THE FACTS, IF SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL
EVIDENCE, SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE. IF ANY PARTY SHALL APPLY
TO THE COURT FOR LEAVE TO ADDUCE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE, AND
SHALL SHOW TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COURT THAT SUCH
ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IS MATERIAL AND THAT THERE WERE
REASONABLE GROUNDS FOR FAILURE TO ADDUCE SUCH EVIDENCE IN
THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION, THE COURT MAY
ORDER SUCH ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE TO BE TAKEN BEFORE THE
COMMISSION AND TO BE ADDUCED UPON THE HEARING IN SUCH
MANNER AND UPON SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS TO THE COURT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
