clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1977
Volume 735, Page 513   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
513
MARVIN MANDEL, Governor
PASSENGERS IN A SEPARATE VEHICLE. (3) TO ENABLE THE PROVISION OF SERVICE FOR
WHICH THESE IS AN IMMEDIATE AND URGENT NEED TO A POINT OR
POINTS OR WITHIN A TERRITORY HAVING NO CARRIER SERVICE
CAPABLE OF MEETING SUCH NEED, THE COMMISSION MAY, IN ITS
DISCRETION AND WITHOUT HEARINGS OR OTHER PROCEEDINGS,
GRANT TEMPORARY AUTHORITY FOR SUCH SERVICE. SUCH
TEMPORARY AUTHORITY UNLESS SUSPENDED OR REVOKED FOR GOOD
CAUSE, SHALL BE VALID FOR SUCH TIME AS THE COMMISSION
SHALL SPECIFY, BUT FOR NOT MORE THAN AN AGGREGATE OF 180
DAYS AND CREATE NO PRESUMPTION THAT CORRESPONDING
PERMANENT AUTHORITY WILL BE GRANTED THEREAFTER. (E)   REQUIRING ADDITIONAL SERVICES OR ROUTES. THE COMMISSION MAY, IF IT FINDS THAT THE PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY SO REQUIRE, REQUIRE ANY PERSON
SUBJECT TO THIS COMPACT TO EXTEND ANY EXISTING SERVICE
OR PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL SERVICE OVER ADDITIONAL ROUTES
WITHIN THE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT
NO CERTIFICATE SHALL BE ISSUED TO OPERATE OVER THE ROUTES
OF ANY HOLDER OF A CERTIFICATE UNTIL IT SHALL BE PROVED
TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COMMISSION, AFTER HEARING,
UPON REASONABLE NOTICE, THAT THE SERVICE RENDERED BY SUCH
CERTIFICATE HOLDER, OVER SUCH ROUTE, IS INADEQUATE TO THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE PUBLIC NECESSITY AND CONVENIENCE; AND
PROVIDED, FURTHER, IF THE COMMISSION SHALL BE OF OPINION
THAT THE SERVICE RENDERED BY SUCH CERTIFICATE HOLDER OVER
SUCH ROUTE IS IN ANY RESPECT INADEQUATE TO THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE PUBLIC NECESSITY AND CONVENIENCE,
SUCH CERTIFICATE HOLDER SHALL BE GIVEN REASONABLE TIME
AND OPPORTUNITY TO REMEDY SUCH INADEQUACY BEFORE ANY
CERTIFICATE SHALL BE GRANTED TO OPERATE OVER SUCH ROUTE;
AND FURTHER PROVIDED THAT NO PERSON SUBJECT TO THIS
COMPACT MAY BE REQUIRED TO EXTEND ANY EXISTING SERVICE OR
PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL SERVICE OVER ADDITIONAL ROUTES
WITHIN THE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT UNLESS THE CARRIER IS
CURRENTLY EARNING A REASONABLE RETURN ON ITS OPERATION AS
A WHOLE IN PERFORMING TRANSPORTATION SUBJECT TO THIS
COMPACT. (F)   ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS BY BOARD. THE COMMISSION MAY REFER TO THE TRAFFIC AND HIGHWAY BOARD CREATED UNDER TITLE I HEREOF ANY SERVICE PROPOSED
UNDER AN APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE. THE BOARD SHALL
AS SPEEDILY AS POSSIBLE GIVE THE COMMISSION ITS
RECOMMENDATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED SERVICE, BUT
SUCH RECOMMENDATIONS SHALL BE ADVISORY ONLY. (G)   DURATION, AMENDMENT, REVOCATION, OR SUSPENSION
OF CERTIFICATE; DUPLICATION OF ROUTES. CERTIFICATES SHALL BE EFFECTIVE FROM DATE SPECIFIED
THEREIN AND SHALL REMAIN IN EFFECT UNTIL SUSPENDED OR
TERMINATED AS HEREIN PROVIDED. ANY SUCH CERTIFICATE,
MAY, UPON APPLICATION OF THE HOLDER THEREOF, IN THE


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1977
Volume 735, Page 513   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact msa.helpdesk@maryland.gov.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives