|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARVIN MANDEL, Governor 435
CONSIDERS DESIRABLE. HOWEVER, THE ADMINISTRATION MAY NOT
DENY AN ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNER ALL ACCESS ALONG ANY
STATE HIGHWAY OTHER THAN A PARKWAY OR FREEWAY.
REVISOR'S NOTE: This section presently appears as
Art. 89B, §§ 44 and 45.
In subsection (a) of this section, the rule
for determining average traffic volume is that
which appears in present §44; for clarity, it
has been made applicable to all traffic
volumes to be determined under this section.
In subsection (b) (2) of this section, the
actual penalty provided for in §8—646 (present
§43) is substituted for the present
cross—reference to it.
In subsection (c)(2) of this section, a
reference to parkways is added in light of
§8-619(c) of this subtitle.
The only other changes are in style.
8-626. INDUSTRIAL CROSSINGS.
(A) POWER TO ESTABLISH.
(1) SUBJECT TO THIS SECTION AND WITH THE
ADVICE AND APPROVAL OF THE ADMINISTRATION, THE
LEGISLATIVE BODY OF ANY COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
IN THIS STATE MAY DESIGNATE AN INDUSTRIAL CROSSING ACROSS
ANY STATE HIGHWAY LOCATED WITHIN THE COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION.
(2) AN INDUSTRIAL CROSSING MAY NOT BE
DESIGNATED IF IT WILL ENDANGER TRAFFIC ON THE HIGHWAY.
(B) PROCEDURE TO ESTABLISH; LIABILITY OF APPLICANT.
(1) ANY PERSON WHO DESIRES AN INDUSTRIAL
CROSSING ACROSS A STATE HIGHWAY SHALL APPLY FOR
DESIGNATION OF THE CROSSING TO THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF
THE COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION WHERE THE HIGHWAY IS
LOCATED.
(2) AN INDUSTRIAL CROSSING MAY NOT BE
DESIGNATED UNLESS THE APPLICANT PAYS OR AGREES TO PAY
FOR:
(I) THE COSTS OF ANY IMPROVEMENT REQUIRED TO
STRENGTHEN OR MODIFY THE HIGHWAY FOR USE AS AN
INDUSTRIAL CROSSING;
(II) ANY DAMAGE TO THE HIGHWAY THAT RESULTS
FROM ITS USE AS AN INDUSTRIAL CROSSING; AND
(III) THE COSTS OF MAKING, INSTALLING, AND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
