clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1977
Volume 735, Page 2815   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
MARVIN MANDEL, Governor                              2815
(I) (1) ANY AGGRIEVED PERSON IN ANY TRIAL,
HEARING, OR PROCEEDING IN OF BEFORE ANY COURT,
DEPARTMENT, OFFICER, AGENCY, REGULATORY BODY, OR OTHER
AUTHORITY OF THIS STATE OR A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION
THEREOF, MAY MOVE TO SUPPRESS THE CONTENTS OF ANY
INTERCEPTED WIRE OR ORAL COMMUNICATION, OR EVIDENCE
DERIVED THEREFROM, ON THE GROUNDS THAT: (I)    THE COMMUNICATION WAS UNLAWFULLY INTERCEPTED; (II)   THE ORDER OF AUTHORIZATION UNDER
WHICH IT WAS INTERCEPTED IS INSUFFICIENT ON ITS FACE; OR
, OR WAS NOT OBTAINED OR ISSUED IN STRICT, COMPLIANCE WITH
THIS SUBTITLE; OR (III)  THE INTERCEPTION WAS NOT MADE IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE ORDER OF AUTHORIZATION. (2)    THIS MOTION SHALL MAY BE MADE BEFORE OR
DURING THE TRIAL, HEARING, OR PROCEEDING UNLESS THERE WAS NO OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE IT OR THE PERSON WAS NOT AWARE OF THE GROUNDS OF THE MOTION. IF THE MOTION IS GRANTED, THE
CONTENTS OF THE INTERCEPTED WIRE OR ORAL COMMUNICATION,
OR EVIDENCE DERIVED THEREFROM, SHALL BE TREATED AS HAVING
BEEN OBTAINED IN VIOLATION OF THIS SUBTITLE. THE JUDGE,
UPON THE FILING OF THE MOTION BY THE AGGRIEVED PERSON, IN
HIS DISCRETION MAY MAKE AVAILABLE TO THE AGGRIEVED PERSON
OR HIS COUNSEL FOR INSPECTION SUCH PORTIONS OF THE
INTERCEPTED COMMUNICATION OF EVIDENCE DERIVED THEREFROM
AS THE JUDGE DETERMINES TO BE IN THE INTERESTS OF
JUSTICE. (3)    IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER RIGHT TO
APPEAL, THE STATE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL FROM AN
ORDER GRANTING A MOTION TO SUPPRESS MADE UNDER PARAGRAPHS (1) AND (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION, OF THE DENIAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER OF APPROVAL, IF THE PROSECUTING
ATTORNEY SHALL CERTIFY TO THE JUDGE OR OTHER OFFICIAL GRANTING THE MOTION OR DENYING THE APPLICATION THAT THE APPEAL IS NOT TAKEN FOR PURPOSES OF DELAY. THE APPEAL
SHALL BE TAKEN WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE DATE THE ORDER
WAS ENTERED AND SHALL BE DILIGENTLY PROSECUTED. 10-409. (A) WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF AN ORDER (OR EACH EXTENSION THEREOF) ENTERED UNDER SECTION 10-408 OF THIS SUBTITLE, THE ISSUING JUDGE SHALL REPORT
TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS; (1)    THE FACT THAT AN ORDER OR EXTENSION WAS
APPLIED FOR; (2)    THE KIND OF ORDER OR EXTENSION APPLIED
FOR;
(3) THE FACT THAT THE ORDER OR EXTENSION WAS


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1977
Volume 735, Page 2815   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact msa.helpdesk@maryland.gov.

©Copyright  August 17, 2024
Maryland State Archives