|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2810 LAWS OF MARYLAND Ch. 692
ORDER SHALL BE REQUIRED IF THE INTERCEPTION IS LAWFUL
UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 10-402(C) OF THIS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUBTITLE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-407.
(A) ANY INVESTIGATIVE OR LAW-ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
WHO, BY ANY MEANS AUTHORIZED BY THIS SUBTITLE, HAS
OBTAINED KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONTENTS OF ANY WIRE OR ORAL
COMMUNICATION, OR EVIDENCE DERIVED THEREFROM, MAY
DISCLOSE THE CONTENTS TO ANOTHER INVESTIGATIVE OR
LAW-ENFORCEMENT OFFICER TO THE EXTENT THAT THE DISCLOSURE
IS APPROPRIATE TO THE PROPER PERFORMANCE OF THE OFFICIAL
DUTIES OF THE OFFICER MAKING OR RECEIVING THE DISCLOSURE.
(B) ANY INVESTIGATIVE OR LAW-ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
WHO, BY ANY MEANS AUTHORIZED BY THIS SUBTITLE, HAS
OBTAINED KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONTENTS OF ANY WIRE OR ORAL
COMMUNICATION OR EVIDENCE DERIVED THEREFROM MAY USE THE
CONTENTS TO THE EXTENT THE USE IS APPROPRIATE TO THE
PROPER PERFORMANCE OF HIS OFFICIAL DUTIES.
(C) ANY PERSON WHO HAS RECEIVED, BY ANY MEANS
AUTHORIZED BY THIS SUBTITLE, ANY INFORMATION CONCERNING A
WIRE OR ORAL COMMUNICATION, OR EVIDENCE DERIVED THEREFROM
INTERCEPTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS
SUBTITLE, MAY DISCLOSE THE CONTENTS OF THAT COMMUNICATION
OR THE DERIVATIVE EVIDENCE WHILE GIVING TESTIMONY UNDER
OATH OR AFFIRMATION IN ANY PROCEEDING HELD UNDER THE
AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES OR OF THIS STATE OR ANY
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF.
(D) AN OTHERWISE PRIVILEGED WIRE OR OPAL
COMMUNICATION INTERCEPTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, OR IN
VIOLATION OF, THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBTITLE, DOES NOT
LOSE ITS PRIVILEGED CHARACTER.
(E) WHEN AN INVESTIGATIVE OR LAW-ENFORCEMENT
OFFICER, WHILE ENGAGED IN INTERCEPTING WIRE OR ORAL
COMMUNICATIONS IN THE MANNER AUTHORIZED HEREIN,
INTERCEPTS WIRE OR ORAL COMMUNICATIONS RELATING TO
OFFENSES OTHER THAN THOSE SPECIFIED IN THE ORDER OF
AUTHORIZATION, THE CONTENTS THEREOF, AND EVIDENCE DERIVED
THEREFROM, MAY BE DISCLOSED OR USED AS PROVIDED IN
SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF THIS SECTION. THE CONTENTS
AND ANY EVIDENCE DERIVED THEREFROM MAY BE USED UNDER
SUBSECTION (C) OF THIS SECTION WHEN AUTHORIZED OR
APPROVED BY A JUDGE OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION WHERE THE
JUDGE FINDS ON SUBSEQUENT APPLICATION THAT THE CONTENTS
WERE OTHERWISE INTERCEPTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBTITLE. THE APPLICATION SHALL BE
MADE AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE.
10-408.
(A) EACH APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE
INTERCEPTION OF A WIRE OR ORAL COMMUNICATION SHALL BE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|