|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ch. 154
|
|
|
|
|
1504
|
|
|
|
|
|
LAWS OF MARYLAND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.01.00.04 District Court
General Fund Appropriation....
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,056,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,970,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.01.00.05 Maryland Judicial Conference
To be spent subject to the approval
of the State Court Administrator,
Administrative Office of the Courts.
General Fund Appropriation..........
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.01.00.06 Administrative Office of the Courts
General Fund Appropriation................
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,381,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,356,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
985,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorization is hereby
granted to apportion the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lump sum reduction in the
amount of $ 371,007, by
approved budget amendment
among the various programs
and object codes of the
Judiciary, it not
being the intent that the
full reduction be applied
to this program, but that
provement program be im-
plemented to effect cost
the various operating ob-
jects of expenditure: pro-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vided Provided that this
reduction is contingent
upon the failure to enact
into law S.B. 352 or H.B.
825, and if either of these
bills is enacted into law,
the reduction shall be null
and void.
22.01.00.07 Court Related Agencies
General Fund Appropriation.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
371,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY
Total General Fund Appropriation.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,013,064
21,642,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PUBLIC DEFENDER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.02.00.01 Office of the Public Defender
General Fund Appropriation................ 6,562,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,538,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
