clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1975
Volume 716, Page 355   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

MARVIN MANDEL, Governor                                 355

THE CASE OF SPECIALLY PACKAGED MANUFACTURERS' SAMPLES
WHICH ARE DESIGNATED ON THE PACKAGE AS NOT TO BE SOLD; OR

(4) MAKE ANY REBATE, ADVERTISING ALLOWANCE,
OR ANY OTHER CONCESSION BY ANY MEANS OR DEVICE IN
CONNECTION WITH THE SALE OF CIGARETTES WHEREBY THE
CIGARETTES ARE IN EFFECT SOLD BELOW THEIR COST TO THE
RETAILER OR THEIR COST TO THE WHOLESALER, RESPECTIVELY.

(B) EXCEPTION.

A RETAILER OR WHOLESALER MAY PASS ON TO A PURCHASER
ANY REDUCTION IN COST WHICH RESULTS FROM:

(1)     PAYMENT OR COMPENSATION GIVEN BY A
MANUFACTURER OF CIGARETTES ON A UNIFORM AND
NONDISCRIMINATORY BASIS FOR PROMOTIONAL SERVICES; OR

(2)   ANY COUPON ISSUED AND ULTIMATELY REDEEMED
BY A CIGARETTE MANUFACTURES.

REVISOR'S NOTE: This section presently appears as
Art. 83, §120.

The reference to violations of the UnFair
Sales Act, presently appearing in the
introductory paragraph to Art. 83, §120 is
deleted as inconsistent with §11—509 of this
subtitle.

The only other changes are in style.

11-506. EVIDENCE.

(A)   PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF INTENT.

IN ANY PROCEEDING UNDER THIS SUBTITLE, INCLUDING A
PROCEEDING RELATING TO LICENSES BEFORE THE STATE
COMPTROLLER, PROOF OF A SALE BY A RETAILER OR A
WHOLESALER OF CIGARETTES OR OF ANY OTHER ITEM IN
COMBINATION OR IN CONNECTION WITH CIGARETTES AT LESS THAN
THEIR COST TO THE RETAILER OR THEIR COST TO THE
WHOLESALER, RESPECTIVELY, IS PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF
INTENT TO INJURE A COMPETITOR OR TO DESTROY OR
SUBSTANTIALLY LESSEN COMPETITION.

(B)   EVIDENCE OF COST.

IN DETERMINING COST TO THE RETAILER OR COST TO THE
WHOLESALER, THE STATE COMPTROLLER OR THE COURT SHALL
RECEIVE AND CONSIDER EVIDENCE:

(1) THAT THE PERSON COMPLAINED AGAINST
PURCHASED CIGARETTES AT A FICTITIOUS PRICE OR ON TERMS,

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1975
Volume 716, Page 355   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives