clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1975
Volume 716, Page 1343   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

MARVIN MANDEL, Governor

1343

OTHER APPROPRIATE OFFICIAL OF THE OTHER STATE.

(C)        IF THE COURT IS INFORMED DURING THE COURSE OF

THE PROCEEDING THAT A PROCEEDING CONCERNING THE CUSTODY
OF THE CHILD WAS PENDING IN ANOTHER STATE BEFORE THE
COURT ASSUMED JURISDICTION IT SHALL STAY THE PROCEEDING
AND COMMUNICATE WITH THE COURT IN WHICH THE OTHER
PROCEEDING IS PENDING TO THE END THAT THE ISSUE MAY BE
LITIGATED IN THE MORE APPROPRIATE FORUM AND THAT
INFORMATION BE EXCHANGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS
[[3-1018 THROUGH 3—1021]] 201 THROUGH 204 OF THIS
SUBTITLE.        IF A COURT OF THIS STATE HAS MADE A CUSTODY

DECREE BEFORE BEING INFORMED OF A PENDING PROCEEDING IN A
COURT OF ANOTHER STATE IT SHALL IMMEDIATELY INFORM THAT
COURT OF THE FACT.        IF THE COURT IS INFORMED THAT A

PROCEEDING WAS COMMENCED IN ANOTHER STATE AFTER IT
ASSUMED JURISDICTION IT SHALL LIKEWISE INFORM THE OTHER
COURT TO THE END THAT THE ISSUES MAY BE LITIGATED IN THE
MORE APPROPRIATE FORUM.

[[3-1006]] 189.

(A)         A COURT WHICH HAS JURISDICTION UNDER THIS
SUBTITLE TO MAKE AN INITIAL OR MODIFICATION DECREE MAY
DECLINE TO EXERCISE ITS JURISDICTION ANY TIME BEFORE
MAKING A DECREE IF IT FINDS THAT IT IS AN INCONVENIENT
FORUM TO MAKE A CUSTODY DETERMINATION UNDER THE
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND THAT A COURT OF ANOTHER
STATE IS A MORE APPROPRIATE FORUM.

(B)         A FINDING OF INCONVENIENT FORUM MAY BE MADE
UPON THE COURT'S OWN MOTION OR UPON MOTION OF A PARTY OR
A GUARDIAN AD LITEM OR OTHER REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CHILD.

(C)         IN DETERMINING IF IT IS AN INCONVENIENT FORUM,
THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER IF IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF THE
CHILD THAT ANOTHER STATE ASSUME JURISDICTION. FOR THIS
PURPOSE IT MAY TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FOLLOWING FACTORS,
AMONG OTHERS:

(1)         IF ANOTHER STATE IS OR RECENTLY WAS THE
CHILD'S HOME STATE;

(2)         IF ANOTHER STATE HAS A CLOSER CONNECTION
WITH THE CHILD AND HIS FAMILY OR WITH THE CHILD AND ONE
OR MORE OF THE CONTESTANTS;

(3)         IF SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE CONCERNING THE
CHILD'S PRESENT OR FUTURE CARE, PROTECTION, TRAINING, AND
PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP IS MOPE READILY AVAILABLE IN
ANOTHER STATE;

(4)         IF THE PARTIES HAVE AGREED ON ANOTHER
FORUM WHICH IS NO LESS APPROPRIATE; AND

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1975
Volume 716, Page 1343   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 17, 2024
Maryland State Archives