MARVIN MANDEL, Governor                                 359

provision of Art. 7, §18. Sec. 18 deals with
appeals with respect to arbitration and
award. Most of its language deals with
appeals from final judgments and is thus
covered by §12-301. The particular provision
contained in paragraph (9) might authorize an
appeal from an interlocutory judgment, and
thus is included here. Art. 7, §18 is

proposed for repeal; see Maietta v.

Greenfield, 267 Md. 287, 297A. 2d. 244
(1972).

Sec. 12—306 defines the court in which
review may be sought.

The language added     in proposed paragraphs

(1), (2), and (4)    is contained in the last

paragraph of Art. 5,   §7, which is recommended
for repeal.

Proposed paragraph (8) covers appeals from
interlocutory orders now covered by Art. 5,
§3. Appeals from final orders now authorized
by that section are provided for in §12—301.

Subsection (e) of Art. 5, §7 has been
transferred to §12—304, dealing with contempt
cases.

Subsection (h) of Art. 5, §7 is proposed for
repeal since identical language is contained
in Art. 5, §1A, included here as §12-303 (a).
The last paragraph of subsection (h) has been
inserted in paragraphs (1) , (2) , and (4) .
The only other changes made are in style.

SEC. 12-304. (A) APPEALS IN CONTEMPT CASES; SCOPE OF
REVIEW.

ANY PERSON MAY APPEAL FROM ANY ORDER OR JUDGMENT
PASSED TO PRESERVE THE POWER OR VINDICATE THE DIGNITY
OF THE COURT AND ADJUDGING HIM IN CONTEMPT OF COURT,
INCLUDING AN INTERLOCUTORY ORDER, REMEDIAL IN NATURE,
ADJUDGING ANY PERSON IN CONTEMPT, WHETHER OR NOT A
PARTY TO THE ACTION.

(B) EXCEPTION. THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO AN
ADJUDICATION OF CONTEMPT FOR VIOLATION OF AN
INTERLOCUTORY ORDER FOR THE PAYMENT OF ALIMONY.

REVISOR'S NOTE: This section is basically Art. 5,