MARVIN MANDEL, Governor                                     331

PATENTED LAND IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE STATED BY THE
PATENTED NAME IN A DECLARATION IN AN ACTION AT LAW.
IT MAY BE DESCRIBED BY ABUTTALS, COURSE AND DISTANCE,
OR A NAME BY WHICH IT WAS ACQUIRED. THE DESCRIPTION
SHALL BE CERTAIN ENOUGH TO IDENTIFY THE LAND.

(B)   PROOF REQUIRED.

WHEN TITLE OF PATENTED LAND IS QUESTIONED, A PARTY
IS NOT REQUIRED TO PROVE THAT THE LAND WAS PATENTED.
A PATENT SHALL BE PRESUMED IN FAVOR OF THE PARTY
SHOWING A TITLE OTHERWISE GOOD.

(C)   ACTS OF PARTY.

ACTS OF EXCLUSIVE USER AND OWNERSHIP ARE
ADMISSIBLE TO PROVE POSSESSION. ACTUAL EVIDENCE OF
ENCLOSURE IS NOT NECESSARY FOR THIS PROOF.

REVISOR'S NOTE: This section is new language
derived from Art. 75, §§ 11 and 33. These
sections are combined into a single section
and subdivided because of their related
subject matter. Changes are made in language
and style.

SEC. 10-910. NEGLIGENCE NOT IMPUTED TO INFANT.

IN AN ACTION ON BEHALF OF AN INFANT TO RECOVER FOR
DEATH, PERSONAL INJURY, OR PROPERTY DAMAGE THE
NEGLIGENCE OF THE PARENT OR CUSTODIAN OF THE INFANT
MAY NOT BE IMPUTED TO THE INFANT.

REVISOR'S NOTE: This section is new language
derived from Art. 75, §2. This section is
removed from Art. 75 and placed among the
Miscellaneous Rules of this subtitle as a
more logical placement for its subject matter
because of its relationship to a cause of
action- Changes are made in style.

GENERAL REVISOR'S NOTE:

The Commission to Revise the Annotated Code, in
compiling Title 10 of the Courts and Judicial
Proceedings Article, concluded that certain provisions
of present law originally allocated to Title 10 are
repetitious, obsolete, or more properly allocable
elsewhere. Accordingly, these provisions are not
embodied in Title 10. Their proposed treatment is as