316                                             LAWS OF MARYLAND                                 [Ch. 2

APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO OBTAIN TELEPHONIC AND
TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS ON THE SAME INSTRUMENT OR
FOR THE SAME PERSON AND IF A PRIOR APPLICATION EXISTS
THE APPLICANT SHALL DISCLOSE ITS CURRENT STATUS.

(D)   IDENTIFICATION.

THE APPLICATION AND ANY ORDER ISSUED UNDER THIS
SECTION SHALL IDENTIFY AS FULLY AS POSSIBLE THE
PARTICULAR TELEPHONE OR TELEGRAPH LINE FROM WHICH THE
INFORMATION IS TO BE OBTAINED AND THE PURPOSE.

(E)   EXAMINATION BY COURT.

THE COURT SHALL EXAMINE UPON OATH OR AFFIRMATION
THE APPLICANT ANE ANY WITNESS THE APPLICANT DESIRES TO
PRODUCE OR THE COURT REQUIRES TO BE PRODUCED.

[[(F) DURATION OF ORDERS.

THE AUTHORIZATION TO INTERCEPT SHALL BE EXECUTED
AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE, AND SHALL BE CONDUCTED TO
MINIMIZE THE INTERCEPTION OF COMMUNICATIONS NOT
OTHERWISE SUBJECT TO INTERCEPTION. AN ORDER ISSUED
UNDER THIS SUBTITLE SHALL TERMINATE AUTOMATICALLY WHEN
THE COMMUNICATION DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER OR WHEN THE
AUTHORIZED OBJECTIVE OF THE ORDER HAS BEEN FIRST
OBTAINED. AN ORDER MAY NOT CONTINUE FOR MORE THAN 30
DAYS UNLESS RENEWED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (G).

(G) RENEWAL OF ORDER.

AN ORDER MAY BE RENEWED FOR ONE ADDITIONAL PERIOD
NOT TO EXCEED 30 DAYS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS AND
LIMITATIONS OF SUBSECTION (F) UPON APPLICATION OF THE
OFFICER WHO SECURED THE ORIGINAL ORDER TO THE COURT
WHICH ISSUED IT. ]]

(F)  DURATION OF ORDER.

NO ORDER ISSUED UNDER__THIS SECTION SHALL BE

EFFECTIVE FOR LONGER THAN 30 DAYS.

(G) RENEWAL OF ORDER.

UPON APPLICATION OF THE OFFICER WHO SECURED THE

ORIGINAL ORDER, THE COURT WHICH ISSUED THE___ORDER__MAY

RENEW OR CONTINUE THE ORDER FOR AN ADDITIONAL PERIOD
NOT TO EXCEED 30 DAYS.

REVISOR'S NOTE: In State v. Siegal, 266 Md. 256