clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e
  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1972
Volume 708, Page 1975   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

Marvin Mandel, Governor                       1975

The Chief Judge of the District Court of Maryland has re-
quested that I veto House Bill 993 because the notices, as set forth
in the bill, are defective. The Chief Judge has informed me that
the Court will administratively implement the objectives of House
Bill 993. For the reasons given in the attached copy of the Chief
Judge's letter, which is to be considered a part of this message,
I believe this measure must be vetoed.

Sincerely,

/s/ Marvin Mandel,

Governor.

Letter from District Court of Maryland

May 16,1972.
Mr. John C. Eldridge
Executive Department
State of Maryland
Annapolis, Maryland 21404

Dear Mr. Eldridge:

House Bill 993, prepared by the Landlord Tenant Commission,
had a worthy objective, which was to provide a means of com-
municating with the tenant in simple language. However, Section
39S—Notice to Come to Court contemplates a legally insufficient
form in that, contrary to the stated language (line 29) it is not a
complaint.

The Put Out notice, provided for in the same bill, would be an
exercise in futility, because the landlord—tenant law, both present
and proposed, (House Bill 439), provides that:

(1)    appeals are to be filed within two days after judgment is
rendered

(2)    applications for warrant of ejectment are received by the
court two days after judgment is rendered, at which time,
if the warrant is issued, the "put out date" is established.

Thus, the tenant would not receive this notice until after the
time for an appeal had passed, and the date of "put out" would re-
main uncertain.

We have discussed this with Judge Silver, Chairman of the
Landlord-Tenant Commission, with Minor Carter who developed this
bill, and with Professor McElhaney, advisor to the Committee, and
all agree that it will be sufficient if we provide a simple statement
to the tenant of his rights and of possible court action to be included
in the original mailing. This we will do.

For this reason, I recommend that the Governor veto this bill.

Sincerely,

/s/ Robert F. Sweeney,

Chief Judge.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1972
Volume 708, Page 1975   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 11, 2023
Maryland State Archives