1969] OF THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES 17
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
Annapolis, Md., May 28, 1969.
Honorable Thomas Hunter Lowe
Speaker of the House of Delegates
State House
Annapolis, Maryland
Dear Mr. Speaker:
In accordance with Article II, Section 17, of the Maryland Consti-
tution, I have today vetoed House Bill 387 and am returning it to you.
This Bill provides for a distribution and production tax on natural
gas, or other gases, taken from the earth in Allegany County.
I am informed by the Attorney General that this Bill is in conflict
with Article 15 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights and Article III,
Section 29, of the Maryland Constitution. For the reasons given in the
attached copy of his opinion, which is to be considered a part of this
message, I believe that the measure must be vetoed.
Sincerely,
/s/ Marvin Mandel,
Governor.
Read and journalized.
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
May 7, 1969.
Honorable Marvin Mandel
Governor of Maryland
State House
Annapolis, Maryland 21404
Re: House Bill 387
Dear Governor Mandel:
As requested by you, we have reviewed for constitutionality House
Bill 387. It is our opinion for the following reasons that this bill is in
conflict with Article 15 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights and Article
III, Section 29, of the Maryland Constitution and, therefore, should not be
signed into law.
House Bill 387 adds new Sections 572-1 to 572-10, inclusive, to the
Code of Public Local Laws of Allegany County. These sections provide
generally for levying a distribution and production tax on natural gas, or
other gases, taken from the earth in Allegany County. This is a county
tax and all receipts gained from the imposition of this tax are to be ac-
counted for and paid into the General Funds of Allegany County.
It is our opinion that this bill violates the equality and uniformity
provisions of Article 15 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights because
Section 572-1 (i) creates an exemption from taxation for State purposes
upon the gas, the property rights attached thereto, and all the values
created thereby while like properties in other counties of the State would
continue to be subject to State taxation. Section 572-1 (i) provides as
follows:
|