Volume 665, Page 906 View pdf image |
906 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [March 8,
So the amendment was not assented to. Mr. Sudler, of Somerset, proposed the following amend- In section 5, strike out "three hundred dollars," and insert Which was not assented to. Mr. Ford, of Cecil county, proposed the following amend- In section 5, strike out "three hundred dollars" and insert Which was not assented to. Mr. Thurston proposed the following amendment: "Strike out section 6;" Which was assented to. Mr. McPherson proposed the following amendment:. "Add section 6. And be it enacted, That nothing in this Which was assented to. Mr. Summers proposed the following amendment: "Add section 7. And be it enacted, That nothing in this Which was assented to. The said bill was then read the second time, and ordered The rules were suspended, and Said bill was read a third time, by special order, and re-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume 665, Page 906 View pdf image |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.