clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Session Laws, 1990 Session
Volume 436, Page 3173   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

WILLIAM DONALD SCHAEFER, Governor

SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take
effect July 1, 1990.

May 25, 1990

The Honorable Thomas V. Mike Miller, Jr.

President of the Senate

State House

Annapolis, Maryland 21401

Dear Mr. President:

In accordance with Article II, Section 17 of the Maryland Constitution, I have today
vetoed Senate Bill 500.

Maryland's Statute of Repose, enacted in 1970, prevents lawsuits for "wrongful death,
personal injury, or injury to real or personal property" resulting from the "defective and
unsafe condition of an improvement to real property (that) occurs more than 20 years
after the date the entire improvement first becomes available for its intended use". The
law sets a time period within which all suits for recovery for recovery for these injuries
must be filed.

Recent Maryland trial court decisions and one federal district court decision appeared
to apply the protection of the Statute of Repose to manufacturers and suppliers of a
asbestos products included as improvements to real property. If these decisions were
upheld on appeal, for buildings more than 20 years old, these decisions could bar claims
by individuals for personal injury or wrongful death, and by building owners for
property damages, such as the cost of asbestos removal.

With this background, Senate Bill 500 was introduced and passed to retroactively limit
the protection of the Statute of Repose in suits against manufacturers. Persons who
suffered wrongful death or personal injury from a latent or occupational disease or
injury, or from asbestos would be able to sue regardless of the 20-year limit. Persons
who sustained injury to real or personal property would also be able to sue for damages.
In many instances, these people would be able to sue suppliers.

1 have heard from many individuals, organizations, associations, businesses, and
government officials urging me to either sign or veto Senate Bill 500. I am especially
aware of the pain and heartbreak of those individuals who have asbestosis or know or
are related to someone who has the disease. Asbestosis is a debilitating disease, often
taking a long period to manifest itself, and there is substantial evidence that
manufacturers knew 40 or 50 years ago that asbestos was a dangerous material. I also
know that the cost of asbestos removal is in the millions, and that local governments,
school systems, and the State itself could possibly benefit if the Statute of Repose did
not limit lawsuits from being filed 20 years after a building was completed.

- 3173 -


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Session Laws, 1990 Session
Volume 436, Page 3173   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 17, 2024
Maryland State Archives