|
1
|
the reasons that made me think maybe if the charter home
|
|
2
|
rule counties are happy enough with their express powers
|
|
3
|
act and if the Legislature has tended to treat them as a
|
|
4
|
group, which according to Miss Spencer in some conversa-
|
|
3
|
tions I have had with local officials is true, rather than
|
|
6
|
individually, we might do well just to stay with the
|
|
7
|
present express powers act and the present constitution
|
|
8
|
where the charter home rule counties are concerned and
|
|
9
|
try to get an equally broad express powers act for code
|
|
10
|
counties .
|
|
11
|
MR. KELVIN: Could I ask Dr. Loevy a question?
|
|
12
|
Do you have in mind that you would retain the present
|
|
13
|
s ituation whereby only charter counties would have these
|
|
14
|
express powers?
|
|
15
|
DR. LOEVY: The way the constitution reads now
|
|
16
|
is three different sets of express powers, one for municipa
|
|
17
|
ities, and one that will come into being with the code
|
|
18
|
counties. I would recommend that as an alternative we
|
|
19
|
might consider keeping this system.
|
|
20
|
MR. MELVIN: Which would mean there would still
|
|
21
|
be counties whose powers would continue to be really
|
