1
|
differentiating between operational and mechanical pro-
|
2
|
visions could well be left to statute. It could be in the
|
3
|
infinite wisdom of the Constitutional Convention Commission
|
4
|
that they would want to take cognizance of these things.
|
5
|
For example, what you know now is in the budget
|
6
|
bill is the operating budget and the capital budget comes
|
7
|
up actually as a supplement, with its own source of revenue
|
8
|
In the case of it being financed from bonds, this is a
|
9
|
source of revenue and, to my utter amazement, the Court of
|
10
|
Appeals has also ruled that this is, this appropriation
|
11
|
bill for capital improvements is a, well, it's both an
|
12
|
appropriation and revenue measure because it is supplements
|
13
|
billing. Usually these are differentiated.
|
14
|
This brings up the question that Lauber mentioned
|
15
|
about putting the appropriation in the specific bill
|
16
|
where additional legislation is introduced, and that I woul
|
17
|
object to, on the basis that it is not considered good
|
18
|
legislative draftmanship to include appropriations in
|
19
|
substantive measures. As a matter of fact, at the Federal
|
20
|
level, this is prohibited.
|
21
|
THE CHAIRMAN: In bills of that nature, if you
|