1
|
parliamentary characteristic that the legislature cannot
|
2
|
increase the executive's recommendations.
|
3
|
Now, at first, when I was confronted with this
|
4
|
provision in '52, I wasn't too pleased with it because I
|
5
|
thought it was a natural inhibition upon our legislative
|
6
|
authority but, as the years have rolled by, I not only
|
7
|
have become accustomed to it, but I look upon it with
|
8
|
some fondness, and, as a result, even County Charters which
|
9
|
I have had the opportunity to draft in this State follow
|
10
|
the same practice, since one can readily say it is constant
|
11
|
with Maryland traditions in that case.
|
18
|
I also think of it, this basic provision, against
|
13
|
the executive backdrop and particularly the Federal situa-
|
14
|
tion, with which I am also familiar, having been for four
|
15
|
years a senior official of the U.S. Burea of the Budget,
|
16
|
and with rare exception at the Federal level it is almost
|
17
|
unusual for a President to allow an agency of the Federal
|
18
|
Government to spend more than he has budgeted for them,
|
19
|
even though the Congress may increase the appropriation.
|
20
|
You will recall the famous —
|
21
|
THE CHAIRMAN: How can he prevent it?
|