|
1
|
not in the Constitution?
|
|
2
|
MR. LAUBER: That is right. In other words,
|
|
3
|
I would put in the Constitution this provision, that it
|
|
4
|
must be spent either in accordance with the appropriation
|
|
5
|
or a provision in the Appropriation Act. Then when you
|
|
6
|
look at the Appropriation Act, you would have a complete
|
|
7
|
catalog of all the money they are spending and the authori-
|
|
8
|
zation for it. This couid keep it for, your intention,
|
|
9
|
but would not prevent it from being used for the purpose
|
|
10
|
for which it was given.
|
|
11
|
I would not contemplate any ^ifficulty politicall
|
|
12
|
in putting in such a provision.
|
|
13
|
DR. JENKINS: Another problem we face, particular
|
|
14
|
ly in these days and we would be facing it increasingly,
|
|
15
|
and I don't know the specific answer to it, with regard to
|
|
16
|
Federal funds, where in higher education, and this would
|
|
17
|
be in other areas also, where presently the Budget Bureau
|
|
18
|
makes a decision as to whether or not an institution shoulc
|
|
19
|
carry on a particular program, and I recognize that where
|
|
20
|
State funds are involved, this is necessary, and yet this
|
|
21
|
goes back to the problem, one problem of autonomy.
|
