|
1
|
complexity, the greater problems we are facing, I would
|
|
2
|
be inclined to have two scrutinies of every issue rather
|
|
3
|
than one. Checks and balances, I think there is a check
|
|
4
|
and balance that we have, it doesn't happen often, but
|
|
5
|
many times, if for only convenience, one house will pass
|
|
6
|
a measure knowing full well the other house will take a
|
|
7
|
better look at it.
|
|
8
|
This ought not be the only reason why we
|
|
g
|
should continue the two-house system, but until I have
|
|
10
|
been a product of or at least have seen more evidence of
|
|
11
|
the fact that a unicameral system works better than this
|
|
12
|
one, I personally would be inclined to continue with what
|
|
13
|
we have and it is only because I suppose most of us like
|
|
14
|
to keep the status quo. It's very easy to keep what we
|
|
15
|
have, but a little difficult sometimes to step into
|
|
16
|
something that you are unfamiliar with, and I think it
|
|
17
|
has worked well and I would hope that before it is
|
|
18
|
changed we have a little more precedent than just the
|
|
19
|
Nebraska background.
|
|
20
|
THE CHAIRMAN: We are glad to have Mr. Mandel
|
|
21
|
with us, Speaker of the House, and if you care to break
|
